Having skimmed though most of the current MEW, I read the article on Buying and renovating used machinery with interest.
I'm somewhat worried that there is an attitude that regards the renovation of machine tools as mostly involving a clean and a good paint job. OK, I've spent the last two years working on the HLV and fully expect to take 18 months on rebuilding the Beaver mill without even thinking of the paintwork. but surely you can't count a machine as being renovated if you haven't restored its original accuracy, can you?
I've seen machines with a nice paint job and unrepaired wear and damage, even bought one once (knowing what I was buying), but such work tends to make me lose respect for the person that did the job.
I am thinking of writing up the Beaver job for MEW, but it might turn into a series rather than a single article...
Am I being overly critical/obsessive?
Mark Rand RTFM