Nozzle purge and waste bucket setup for the Core One

Nov 01, 2026 Last reply: 19 hours ago 4 Replies
Jump to replies (4)

When everything is working, the tool-changing carriage on this enclosed CoreXY machine grabs a nozzle from one of the numbered docks, heats up over the waste bucket for an initial wipe, purges into a V-shaped silicone block to build backpressure, gets brushed across rear bristles into the bucket, prints, then parks on a silicone sealing pad with an auxiliary cooling fan. That six-step cycle runs on every swap, with the stated goal of cutting purge waste and streamlining multi-material changes.



The hardware around the cycle looks tidy to me. Multi-material PTFE feed tubes route into the machine, and the internal purge bucket is a collection tray filled with small purge pellets. A thumb screw rotates 90 degrees to let the tray slide out, and it goes back in with no recalibration needed. The black enclosure has a transparent front panel over the build plate and linear motion components, a raised top, and an orange spool mounted on the left exterior.



The numbers are what stand out. Over 13 hours 3 minutes and 1,983 tool changes, the INDX setup produced 19.2 grams of waste. For comparison, a competing nozzle changer produced 124.5 grams in 24:53 across 1,974 changes, and another tool changer produced 132.1 grams in 13:32 across 1,975 changes. In my view that gap is a very strong result for a purge-based design.



On-screen, the hotend heating status is shown up to 215 °C, with the bed at 60 °C and the enclosure at 20 °C. Two things remain open for me: questions still hang over how the calibration behaves, and it is unclear whether a purge and cleaning bucket like this will reach regular Core One machines.



Project by Prusa 3D. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


I am curious about the tray removal. If the collection tray slides out after a quarter turn of the thumb screw and drops back in with no recalibration, how does the carriage keep finding the bucket at exactly the right spot on every swap? Does the maker rely on the dock positions alone, or is there some re-referencing step that just was not mentioned?

The thumb screw release seems like a smart call to me. A quarter turn and the tray slides free, no tools, and it returns without recalibration, so emptying pellets does not turn into a half-hour job. The trade-off I see is that a hand-tightened screw has to stay snug through vibration, otherwise alignment could drift over a long multi-material print.

One variation I would like to see: a drop-in liner for the collection tray. Since the pellets sit loose in the tray, a removable liner would let you lift out a full batch in one motion and refill it on the bench, instead of handling pellets inside the enclosure. It would keep the no-recalibration reinstall and make cleanup between long runs much faster.

From what the maker has shown, the tray reinstalls with no recalibration after it slides back in, so the bucket returns to the same working position. Beyond that, no re-referencing step or alignment procedure has been described, so the specific question about how the carriage re-finds the bucket has not been addressed.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required