Hybrid rocket with wax and aluminum fuel shows clean mach diamonds

Oct 26, 2026 Last reply: 3 days ago 3 Replies
Jump to replies (3)

The detail that jumped out at me first is the exhaust: the nozzle on this motor throws off clean supersonic mach diamonds. The maker reports this was the first mathematically optimized nozzle design to produce the diamond pattern, and that is a strong result for a small test motor. The expansion ratio was tuned mathematically for the chamber pressure, so those diamonds are not luck.



The motor, called Test Motor-1B, is a hybrid burning paraffin wax loaded with micron scale aluminum powder against gaseous oxygen. The hardware is straightforward: a metallic tube casing holding a central fuel tube, closed off with metal end pieces and a metal nozzle. Ignition is electrical, and the whole assembly is held on a horizontal test stand with adjustable hose clamps. Firings were run outdoors over asphalt.



The test matrix is what really stands out. Four fuel mixes were fired, with aluminum mass fractions of 0, 3.05, 5.83 and 8.50 percent. Total impulse climbed from 57.07 to 88.75 newton-seconds across the series, while peak thrust stayed between 22.11 and 24.68 newtons and burn duration ranged from 3.10 to 4.38 seconds. The thrust-time curves were produced with CURVE.



The aluminum clearly adds energy and impulse, but it also slows the regression rate and stretches the burn, a genuine trade-off sitting right in the open here. This motor is a development step toward a high-powered rocket producing up to 1kN of thrust. The ignition sequence is worth reading too: a 10 second oxygen purge, a potassium chlorate charge lighting the surrounding wax, then throttling up by raising the oxidizer flow rate.



Project by Canadian Student Space Initiative. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


The stepped aluminum fractions are the smartest part of this for me. Going up in measured stages from 0 to 8.50 percent lets the impulse gain and the longer burn time show up side by side in the data. Holding peak thrust in such a narrow band while total impulse climbs makes the trade-off very easy to read.

How did the maker actually work out the optimal expansion ratio for the chamber pressure? The nozzle result speaks for itself with those mach diamonds, but I would be curious whether the optimization math behind it could be shared somewhere, since it seems like it would help anyone designing their own bell.

Since impulse kept rising at every step up to 8.50 percent aluminum, I would suggest firing one or two mixes above that level. It would show where the slower regression and longer burn start to cost more than the added energy delivers, and it would give one more data point before scaling up toward the 1kN rocket.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required