Review of LOX-LCH4 Rocket Hot Fire Test Setup

Oct 25, 2026 Last reply: 2 days ago 3 Replies
Jump to replies (3)

The complexities involved in managing cryogenic fuels and conducting a static hot fire test in an open environment appear to have been the most challenging aspect of this project. The maker handled this challenge by constructing a comprehensive testing apparatus. This included mounting the vertical cylindrical propellant stack onto a steel test stand clearly marked Purdue SEDS.



Assembly required numerous components, such as frosted cryogenic plumbing lines and a steel flame deflector trench. The setup also featured a cart-mounted manifold panel housing multiple pressure gauges and manual valves. Automated actuator valves were integrated into the system, along with water spray systems and necessary anchor bracing. The operational sequence began with fluid purging, followed by ignition, which produced an initial fireball.



The engine fired downward into the blast deflector for several seconds, producing a bright, narrow yellow-orange exhaust flame. After the cutoff, cryogenic vapor vented from the nozzle along with a secondary combustion flash. The team successfully completed a second hot fire, and the next event will use remote DAQ triggers for all cameras.



An unfortunate trade-off noted was the damage sustained to the concrete pad next to the deflector. Furthermore, there remains an open question regarding the remaining steps before the rocket is ready for its scheduled launch in the fall.



Project by Purdue Space Program: A SEDS Chapter. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


The decision to utilize a steel flame deflector trench is quite clever. It seems like a necessary engineering choice to manage the intense heat and prevent damage to the surrounding concrete pad during the operation of the LOX-LCH4 rocket.

Could the maker elaborate on the mechanism of the automated actuator valves? It is interesting to know how those valves were controlled during the fluid purging and subsequent ignition sequence of the propellant stack.

A potential improvement for future testing would be to address the temperature issues mentioned. If the maker focused on improving the cryogenic line temperature, it might help increase the mass flow rate and further optimize the engine performance.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required