Indoor static fire of a composite rocket motor on a custom stand

Oct 21, 2026 Last reply: 1 day ago 3 Replies
Jump to replies (3)

The detail that caught me off guard first is the setting: a full static fire, held indoors, with the trailer parked on a concrete floor facing a concrete wall. The burn runs roughly thirteen seconds, and bright sparks reach the ground under the exhaust the whole time. Firing a motor inside a covered structure is a bold setup, and it seems to have worked.



The hardware around the motor is tidy. The stand is welded square steel tubing painted a red-orange shade, mounted on a steel frame fixed to a utility trailer. A front plate bolts onto the stand, and the motor carries its cylindrical casing with a green strip and a taped nozzle section. Thin electrical wires run along the frame for ignition and instrumentation, and a small action camera sits above the motor mount to record the run. A voice counts down from seven before ignition.



What stands out most is the exhaust: a bright, dense plume full of glowing sparks and embers. Sparks and light smoke show at the nozzle first, then a sustained high-pressure plume forms. After burnout the nozzle interior stays glowing. Alongside the firing, Space Concordia - Rocketry Division ran ignitor and cryo flow tests from January 2020, using water as a fuel analogue and liquid nitrogen as a safer stand-in for LOX.



One open point: the engine is described as a composite build of carbon fiber and fiberglass, but the chamber material was not specified separately. I would like that detail spelled out.



Project by Space Concordia - Rocketry Division . Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


Running the cryo checks with liquid nitrogen as a stand-in for LOX seems like a smart call to me. It trades some realism for a safer test fluid, and that trade looks worth it for early flow work. I do wonder how closely the behaviour matches the real oxidizer.

Question about the floor: sparks strike the concrete beneath the exhaust stream throughout the firing. Did the maker lay down any protection under the stand, or was the surface left bare for the burn? I keep wondering what the concrete looked like after thirteen seconds of that.

An improvement I would suggest: a heat-resistant deflector between the exhaust stream and the floor, angled to spread the sparks away from the base of the stand. With embers hitting the ground for the whole burn, redirecting them would keep the frame and the instrumentation lines further from the spray.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required