Horizontal static fire of a GOX hybrid motor

Oct 16, 2026 Last reply: 12 hours ago 4 Replies
Jump to replies (4)

When this engine runs, it really runs. The maker fired a hybrid rocket motor burning compressed oxygen in a static test, and the burn puts out an average thrust of 3,000N with peaks reaching 5,500N. The exhaust leaves horizontally as a bright flame, and the plume shows clearly defined shock diamonds along its whole length, which is a treat to watch. Total impulse came in at 15,000Ns with a specific impulse of 220s, solid numbers for a project like this.



The setup looks deliberately serious. The cylindrical casing sits horizontally near the ground, held in a metal mounting structure on the right side, and the whole motor is anchored down with heavy chains and cables. An electronic countdown sounds before ignition, and a small puff of light grey smoke appears at the nozzle just beforehand, after which the motor jumps straight to full thrust. A loud combustion roar carries through the burn, and once it ends a cloud of white residual smoke drifts off across the ground.



One detail stands out as an open question: the clip shows the flame cutting out after roughly two to three seconds, while the stated burn time is 5s. Those two figures do not line up, and it is not clear from what is available whether the early cutoff was planned or a hiccup.



As a first look at this engine, the measured thrust and efficiency make it worth following. The GOX pressure and flowrate behind the burn have not been shared, so there is still plenty to learn about how the motor was fed, but the visible plume behavior alone suggests the combustion side is working well.


I would love to know what pressure and flowrate the GOX was run at. That would make the thrust and Isp figures much easier to compare against other amateur hybrid work. Has the maker mentioned the feed conditions anywhere?

Mounting the motor horizontally with heavy chains and cables seems like a smart call to me. A 5,500N peak is a lot of force to hold onto, and anchoring it that way keeps the test safe without needing a tall vertical stand. The trade-off is that a horizontal burn near the ground means the exhaust and smoke all sweep across one spot, but for a static test that seems like an acceptable compromise.

It would be interesting to see the maker repeat the burn with instrumentation on the oxidizer feed, so the pressure and flowrate could be reported alongside the thrust data. With 220s of specific impulse already measured, adding feed conditions would make each test far more useful for tuning the design and explaining any variation between runs.

The maker has not said what pressure or flowrate the GOX was run at. What is known from the stated numbers: 3,000N average thrust, 5,500N peak, 15,000Ns total impulse, 220s specific impulse, and a 5s burn time. The clip itself shows the flame stopping after roughly two to three seconds, which does not match that stated burn time.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required