Twin boom printed speed plane with retracting tricycle gear

Oct 21, 2026 Last reply: 12 hours ago 4 Replies
Jump to replies (4)

Most quick twins around here start life as a foam kit or a balsa plan, so a fully 3d printed airframe with retractable tricycle gear feels like a different road. What makes it more interesting still is the lineage: the maker set out to double up an earlier single motor airplane and add landing gear, and this red twin is the result.



The layout reads cleanly. A central fuselage pod carries two booms, each with a forward-mounted tractor propeller. Out back, twin vertical tails are joined by a horizontal stabilizer, and the wings get down-turned tips plus yellow flame graphics along them. The retracts are electric mechanical units, with the wheels folding upward into bays inside the nose and the twin nacelles.



On the day it all came together well. Twin electric brushless motors pulled the model down a paved strip, and once airborne it ran high-speed fly-bys, climbing passes and banked turns at 110mph. The maker reckons 140 mph might be within reach, and said the aircraft flew better than expected.



The landing is the sore spot. What was meant as a controlled descent turned into a very rough touchdown, put down to not enough elevator with the flaps down. The maker called the elevator soft and reported no other quirks. How the flare gets sorted for the next landing is still an open question.


Going with electric mechanical retracts that fold the wheels up into bays in the nose and the nacelles is the choice that stands out to me. It keeps the underside tidy for those fast passes, though mechanical units do ask for careful setup in tight bays. At 110mph I think it earns its keep.

Does anyone know whether the maker plans to add more elevator throw for flap-down landings, or was the soft feel there with the flaps up as well? A rough touchdown on a first outing is rough enough that I would want that dialled in before the next flight.

From what the maker has said, the rough landing came down to not enough elevator with the flaps down, and the elevator was described as soft. Beyond that, no other quirks were noted. Whether extra throw is planned for the next flight has not been said.

Before the next outing I would try a flap-to-elevator mix that adds a bump of throw when the flaps drop. The touchdown came up short on elevator with flaps down, so compensating in the mix seems like a cheaper fix than re-tuning the whole tail, and it should make those grass rollouts gentler too.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required