The current debate on the vaguries of the certification process wouldn't even exist if the NAR and the TRA weren't acting as if they were a regulatory agency. The original concept was for the NAR to test motors so as to assure the consumer that they were getting what they paid for, and were in no danger. How has this become the determining factor under which motor makers are judged?
One guess is the NFPA meetings in circa 1997.
Regardless the NAR and the TRA are spending boodles of money fighting the regulatory indiscretion of the BATFE. Which is very good. But isn't it just a tad hypocritical of the NAR to _act_ like a regulatory agency...banning those motors which they don't like for what is apparently no good reason?
The entire testing regime of S&T is nonsensical. How is it that companies like Estes, which have gone through several ownership changes since their last certification, can go over ELEVEN YEARS without a test? If the idea is to protect the consumer why isn't the requirement for timely samples being made? Would you trust a company to build a road that last had it's construction techniques reviewed in 1995?
I think it's _way_ past time for the NAR to put on the Big Boy Pants and revamp the entire certification process. Admit that they have let things get partisan and slip shod, and review the whole affair. How about one static test and ten static firings to determine whether a motor will blow up? Isn't that what we were originally told? To determine whether the motor won't blow up and the average newtons is what the manufactuer is claiming? That isn't hard.
What is hard is describing special priviledges and partisan hatreds as a normal part of the system. That, Bunny, is why so many are now calling Bullshit on you and your henchmen.
You've got a lot of 'splainin to do, Bunny.