I'm wondering about the fin configuration on rockets like the Talon
Fin Configuration Cosmetic or Practical?
Dec 31, 2004
2 Replies
formatting link
is there any aerodynamic purpose to having larger fins further up, and smaller fins behind, or is it just for appearance? Seems like it would be more unstable, although it does make the rocket stand out a bit in a crowd, I suppose.
In a sounding rocket there is no need for the forward fins. No need for forward fins on a space booster either.
In a guided missile however, the forward fins give lift while the rear fins are moved with servos to navigate.
Missiles are really different from normal rockets in many ways, and usually need neutral stability instead of positive stability of a sounding rocket.
In hobby rockets like the Talon, the 'Missile Look' is the selling point.
Or was the missile holder a selling point ?
I'm confused ;-)
Just for looks. If you want efficiency, you want 3FNC.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required