Compact Voron pushed to 1,500 mm/s with external cooling muscle

Oct 29, 2026 Last reply: 7 hours ago 3 Replies
Jump to replies (3)

A Benchy finished in two minutes and forty three seconds is the number that jumps out first. Fail Fast! runs a compact Voron V0 based machine at 1,500 mm/s with accelerations up to 26,000 mm/s², and that pace from a desktop sized frame is what makes this build worth a close look.



The machine sits on a 1515 aluminum extrusion skeleton with an aluminum X-beam carrying the gantry. The direct-drive toolhead stays light, using an LGX Lite extruder and a hotend built around a Volcano block with a CHT nozzle spacer. Cooling gets heavy treatment: two large 6040 axial fans live in printed ducts, and extra fan assemblies hang off the frame sides. Electronics mix 48v and 24v drivers on the control board, and the filament list covers CF nylon and ABS. Visually it is a black frame with an orange toolhead cover, tidy and purposeful.



What stands out most is the structural work. Printed side panels, corner gussets and press-fit upper idler brackets stiffen everything, and the feet are bolted straight into the table. The maker ran sizing with Q = m Cp dT and argues that maximizing airflow mass is the best value for money route to enough cooling at speed, then tuned motion with an MZV input shaper. The stiffening shifted the frame resonances and permitted gentler shaping algorithms.



One open point: anchoring the feet to the table made no difference to the resonance readings. The structural changes are what moved the needle, and where the next ceiling sits is an open question.



Project by Fail Fast!. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


The choice to mount large auxiliary fan assemblies outside the frame sides seems like a smart call to me. Sizing the cooling from a heat formula rather than guessing shows real discipline, and pairing twin 6040 units in printed ducts should give plenty of margin. The trade-off is bulk: those external units take up room around the machine and add clutter to an otherwise tidy black frame.

How were the resonance measurements taken before and after the stiffening work? I am curious whether the printed side panels, gussets and idler brackets were added one at a time with a fresh measurement after each change, or all fitted at once. Also wondering what input shaper was in use before the gentler algorithms became usable.

Now that the structural changes have shifted the resonances and gentler shaping is working, I would suggest stepping the acceleration beyond 26,000 mm/s² gradually and watching how the stiffer corners handle it. If the printed gussets hold up well, extending the same bracing idea to the lower frame could buy additional headroom. That would be a cheap experiment compared with swapping hardware.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required