Ok, another question unanswerable by the people teaching my TIG class. So I started out alright, then a while ago all my welds went to crap. I wasn't sure why, so I had one of the teaching assistants stand there and watch me weld... her response was "I don't see you doing anything wrong, I have no idea why your welds are coming out so poorly." She could do just fine using my exact same setup, and my lab partner was doing reasonably well too, but EVERYTHING I did was turning black and crusty, like there was no shielding gas.
So today, due to people leaving early, I moved to a different machine and all of a sudden I was turning out beautiful welds. Seriously, I'm not normally one to brag or even be proud of my work, but I turned out some good looking welds, especially for a beginner. But what I can't figure out is why just changing machines would make such a huge difference, especially when others can get the machine I was using to work well enough for them. I'm hoping someone can provide some ideas as to why, because now it's become a sort of personal quest to master the other machine.
The original machine I was using is a Lincoln PrecisionTIG 275 with an air cooled torch. The new machine is a Miller Syncrowave 250 with a liquid cooled torch. I can also turn out very good welds on my home machine, a Miller Syncrowave 180SD with an air cooled torch. This is all on 6061 1/8" aluminum with 4340 3/32" filler, and a 3/32" zirconiated tungsten. All metal was cleaned using the same stainless steel brush, and I even used the same gloves and helmet! Seriously, everything that could be the same, was.
A few observations of the setup: With either Miller machine, the amp control had to be set at 125 to get any welding to occur. With the Lincoln, it could be set down around 70 and you still had a little room to spare on the pedal. Gas flow has been anywhere from 10 to 17 CFH, which never made much of a difference on any of the machines. I've been using a gas lens with a #7 alumina cup. The AC balance never made much of a difference either, except on the Miller machines where turning it towards "clean" made for more cleaning and turning it towards "penetration" made for more penetration, as you would expect. On the Lincoln machine, the adjustments never seemed to make too much of a difference either way.
Could it really just be that this Lincoln machine is hosed? If so, how is it that other people in the class do reasonably well on it? Or does Miller just manufacture a more forgiving machine? I know the gas was flowing just fine with the Lincoln, and if anything the Miller machine at school was having flow problems... yet the results speak for themselves. Heck, I'd even post pictures of the results of each to show the massive degree of difference if it'd help. I just plain don't get what could be going on here. If my technique is the same, and all machines have been adjusted in pretty much every conceivable way, what could be causing this situation? Thanks for any help that can be given... I really am confused on this one, and want to get to the bottom of it!
Bryan