I've been looking at these mini lathes that Harbor freight sells...7X10 and 8X12...has anyone bought one of these?? I'm thinking that I'll be sorry if I buy one. I don't really *need* a lathe, but I don't really *need* 3 welders either... (hehehe)
Would I be better off buying an old Sears 109 model lathe or similar??
I just want to be able to turn some small, mild steel and aluminum prototype parts.
From what I have seen and from what I have heard they are just junk. Look for a good used lathe and you will be much happier and have much better resale. I am also looking at getting one, not sure why. I am going to look at a 9" southbend lator this week. They seem to run from $100 to $1000 in this neck of the woods. I looked at one a few weeks ago not sure on the make but it was a 4 foot bed, more than I need and more to move than I want. You are up near the finger lakes right? There must be alot of used machines in that area. Its hard to find that great deal and boy have I pasted on a few I shouldn't have.
I would have to agree with a previuos poster - junk is junk. I have made enough mistakes like this to know that this is like flushing money down the crapper.
I had a freind named Tom. His remark about these machines is that "they are an insult to a machinist", and I agree completely. Do not reward their poor craftsmanship with your hard earned U$D. Dont be fooled by a slick paint job, there's junk in the trunk.
My advice to you, if you want a high quality machine, and the experience, BUILD ONE. It is not as difficult as it sounds. You need some good large bearings, or a shaft to hold a chuck. You can weld some things together and hook up a motor to it, or even put a tredle on it. I've got a crappy one in my garage for wax only, and it really does the trick.
Use some old hydraulic shafts as ways. You can easily find material to make a temporary flat faced chuck. The only difficulty would be your cutting tool. You really gotta be careful here because you dont want it to blow up on ya, but I do not think that it would too difficult. You can obtain all of these materials of superior quality from a scrapyard. You dont really need carbide inserts either - you can use abrasive wheels as your cutting wheels if you like (motorized). I'll bet I could do it for less than $100 and get much higher quality than that mini-thing.
Maybe you'll get hooked on building machines and people will start buying from you instead of all this Chineez garbage.
Everyone who has replied so far has been really negative, but they also appear not to have any first hand experience with these machines. In fact, these little lathes are pretty good (within their limits). I'd say that they're definitely better than an old Sears 109 (had one of those back when they were *new* Sears lathes).
It might be a good idea for you to ask people who actually have and use these machines what they think of them. You can try asking your questions in rec.crafts.metalworking. A number of people there have them. Also there's a Yahoo group devoted to these machines.
Now don't expect a Hardinge HLVH or a Monarch 10EE. These are
*little* machines. They aren't very rigid, so you have to go easy with them. But they are a pretty good value as long as you understand and respect their limits.
Plenty of people. There even is a discussion group on yahoo.
Maybe. Old lathe are well built, but miss the speed control of this chinese lathe and their bed may be worn out.
They do work very well for this kind of projects. Actually, they do work surprisingly well, once you take the time to clean them. Please check the web site:
and in the Yahoogroups minilathe forums. Sounds like in 1999 these machines were pretty bad out of the box, but now they have gotten a pretty good reputation, if used within their limits. Almost all are made at the Sieg factory in China and the price can range from $299 to $569 for basically the same lathe, just different color.
The latest reviews on these are quite good and people that use them everyday for the last 5 years or so report that if you take the time to clean them and set them up right, they are reliable and accurate (.0001 runout on the spindle out of the box) enough for the stuff I want to do. I'm thinking that I may take a chance on one of the Homier 7 X 12 units at $299.
The
formatting link
site has some excellent info on tool making and modifications that have been done to improve on these small lathes as well as the 4 X 6 import bandsaws. Some of you might find this site's reading very interesting. I did.
I have a small area that I can allot for a lathe footprint, so the mini-lathes really are appealing to me. From what I've read, they seem to be a option.
Maybe one of these would finally make it possible to build Ernie's tubing bender. You can make all sizes of rollers. He used some sort of plastic mentioned in the text. I wonder if just one big V-roller could be used as a one size fits all? Maybe at least for the larger radii bends.
I *do* have one of these units and they are certainly a significant step above the little Unimats and other baby lathes that many associate with such small machiner.
These lathes are heavy and robust -- you won't find any aluminum in them, they're cast iron and steel.
So long as you remember that they *are* a small lathe then they are very much worth the money.
However, like most machinery coming out of Asia, they do generally require a little "finishing" to realise their full potential. It doesn't hurt to strip them down (not that there's much to strip) and give everything a clean-up and lube.
I regularly turn 304 and 316 stainless in mine -- including pieces up to 4" diameter - although I have to admit that this is really getting near the limits of these machines.
As far as accuracy goes I regularly turn stuff to +/- 0.0005 or better when necessary.
The constantly variable electronic speed controller is also an excellent feature -- no messing with belts or gears -- just dial up the RPMs you want -- you can even wind up the spindle speed when facing as you move towards the center of a workpiece if you want to.
There is nothing inherently wrong with aluminum. If it had been in greater supply in 1940, then you'd be seeing alot more of the old style equipment made of large aluminum castings. Fact is that it all went into aircraft, and so all machinery in those days got made from cast iron.
If you dont believe me on this, then try ripping into an old hard drive. You wont find a bit of steel indisde of it, yet it is a very high precision instrument.
Most of the shortcuts on these items are invisible until you try to use them. I am reminded of a guy who bought a chineez vise for $40. He it it with a hammer and it shattered into pieces.
I have no problem with the chinese people, my wife is 1/2 chinese. But I do have a problem with losing jobs and getting repaid with crappy merchandise.
My nephew came home with some chinese jackstands - and they will be going in the garbage very soon, soon as I can find time to cut them up.
Here's what you do. Get yourself and old motor and weld a plate to the shaft. You can easily rig this up for making things out of wax and cast anything you want. Got one in my shop right now.
QuickFact : If you can weld, then you can free yourself from cheap imports forever.
Cast iron has better damping characteristics than aluminum. It's also much cheeper, easier to cast, doesn't preferentially corrode when coupled with steel and gives you more mass.
Hard drive frames are small and can be easily die-cast which holds better tolerances and reduces the amount of machining required to finish the part.
Kind of comparing apples to oranges here aren't we?
Every object has a resonant frequency. I would agree with you if you said that it had different vibrational characteristics that other metals, but not that they are neccesarily better or worse. This is more a question of design. Actually - aluminum is one of the easiest metals to cast. It shrinks alot - but it's a hell of alot easier than steel or iron.
It is also much more malleable than any iron based alloy, and even most nonferrous. Being malleable affects the way it vibrates to a great extent. There is no way to know if a given component would be better in aluminum or steel based on vibratinoal considerations, other than to build and test. It might be possible to calculate for very simple shapes, for but more complex shapes it is almost impossible even with modern computers. It is impossible to reckon anything regarding vibrations in machinery, the only way to know is to build and test. The Tacoma Narrows bridge was made of steel.
The main advantage of steel is it's hardness. Lathe ways dont get ruined so easily, things probably last much longer, components are more durable. Various components have more mass and therefore more inertia which "implies" smoother machining, but does not gurantee it.
If you are interested in vibrations, you should research the WW2 issue relating to rotational harmonics which was encountered in aircraft drive shafts. This problem caused the failure of many steel driveshafts, and there was no way to predict it at that time, or even today.
Sherline does make a nice *micro* lathe. It is aluminum, and it is very small. Another excellent micro lathe is the Taig. It is a bit more rigid than the Sherline, and a good bit less expensive. Neither of these micro lathes is in the same class as the heavier and larger cast iron mini lathes we're discussing, however.
Aluminum is in plentiful supply today, but the best machine tools are still made from cast iron. There are many good reasons for that. Cast iron has much better damping characteristics (cast iron has the best damping characteristics of any common material), it has much better wear properties (aluminum on aluminum tends to gall), it is much heavier (mass equals rigidity in machine tools), etc.
Now try cutting some heavy steel shafting with it. Doesn't work very well does it?
Irrelevant. The subject is *damping* characteristics. That has essentially nothing to do with resonant frequencies. It does have a lot to do with rapidly dissipating vibrational energy.
Actually, you can just open your copy of Machinery's Handbook, read the secton on critical speeds of shafts, and apply the formulas given there.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.