Re: 89" Dynaflight Super Decath - comments?

M.A.N. did a review of this kit. Search the web and you will find the article. That particular model was powered by a Saito 1.80 and a 4 stroke would be my choice. I'm not familiar with your gas engine but they are better for smoke since they run hotter No need to use a smoke muffler. A

Hi all, > I am gathering up everything I need (kit, motor, servos, etc...) to > build an 89" span Super Decathalon. Interested in any words of wisdom on > the kit and resulting airplane. This is my first large scale and first > gas burner. I recently picked up a Fuji Bt-32a very reasonable with > spring starter and smoke muffler that has only had something like an hour > of run time. What do you think of my motor choice? Any tips on smoke > system to use (never had one of those either)? I've flown a dozen or so > planes (mostly .60 size) of my own and a fair variety of other folks have > me fly their smaller planes on first flights etc... so I feel confident I > can handle this one once I get it built, just want to know if there are > any gotchas to this kit and any words of wisdom on my motor choice, servo > setup/selection etc... Thanks. > > Jack > > P.S. Yes, I know this is not a 3D airplane. 3D doesn't really do it for > me personally. I can watch it for about 10 minutes and then I catch > myself thinking (yeah, OK it's tremendously overpowered and has control > surfaces in excess of 50% of the wing cord, but can you actually "fly" it > or is it just a helicopter wanna-be). No insult intended to you guys who > love that stuff, I know it takes real skill it's just a lot more > interesting to me to see smooth aerobatics performed in a graceful, using > the wing style... That's what I expect out of this airplane, if ever I > learn to fly it! > >
Reply to
strathboy
Loading thread data ...

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.