I run a small landscape architecture firm and we are debating about
whether or not to upgrade to full blown AutoCAD or settle for AutoCAD
lt. I am trying to get a straight answer from someone on what the
real differences are and cannot seem to get a straight answer from my
friendly neighborhood AutoCAD salesman (suprise!)
We do a lot of drafting work, use xrefs, and from time to time import
raster images into our drawings.
If LT does this for $800 per station, then what justification is there
for spending $3K per station on AutoCAD?
Am I missing something here?
15 years ago