On 27 Apr 2004 12:18:48 GMT, firstname.lastname@example.org (NOTHRERNOW27)
I never thought about it like that but your right.
acad 9 (I think) was bad 10 was good, 12 was good, 13 sucked, 14 was
and still is a well rounded acad system.
2000 was a bit buggy, 2000i was still buggy, 2002 is pretty good, 2004
seems very good.
I have heard that. But a guy I worked with seemed to think that 2000
broke the pattern. I have LT 2000i and I have never noticed any
obvious bugs. (But I use it mainly for modifying text, and not every
The worst problem I have found is the statement on the opening Help
screen, "The AutoCAD LT Help System contains complete information for
using AutoCAD LT." That help, and the manual, rival anything from
Microsoft on the scale of uselesness.
Steve M - email@example.com (remove dirt for reply)
Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly,
Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.