PLCs - SLC 500 and ControlLogix


Hi all,
I am not new to PLCs, but I am not all that experienced either, so I
am looking for some "newbee" advice. Pointing me to some online
reference material would be greatly appreicated. My specific Questions
are:
- What are the major differenced between ContolLogix and SLC 500?
- Why would I want to select ControlLogix over SLC 500 or vise versa?
- Is there a FAQ about this material somewhere. I have not been able
to find one.
I am reading through the AB info at their web site, but I would also
like to know what experienced users have to say.
Thanks in Advance,
mze
Reply to
mze
Loading thread data ...
formatting link
is probably a better place to ask
Reply to
Francis
SLC 500's are the older hardware. ControlLogix new and somewhat more complex/virsistal... The software for the SLC will cost you quite a bit less than the higher end stuff for the contrologix... J M H O
st
Reply to
St
Thanks for the link. I was not aware of plctalk.net. MZE
Francis wrote:
Reply to
mze
St, In percentage terms, how much more would a similarly sized ControlLogix system cost compared to a SLC/500 system? I know there are lots of options in both families, but all I am looking for is a ball park figure on simulary sized systems that you may have worked with. Thanks. Mze
St wrote:
Reply to
mze
I don't know what it's like where you are, but over here (down under), CLogix is roughly 1.5-2 times more than a similar-sized SLC depending on I/O count and type - including software.
Actually just last week we ripped out an SLC and replaced it with a CLogix doing the same job - although they're a good platform when left alone, the SLC was comparatively just too much of a pain in the butt..
Cameron:-)
Reply to
Cameron Dorrough
Why was the SLC a pain in hte butt? I've done similar jobs and mostly it was just because the customer wanted A-B's latest and greatest. I've also done other jobs where I simply upgraded a 5/02 (DH485) or a 5/04 (DH+) to a 5/05 (Ethernet) just so the customer could resolve connectivity issues. Processor upgrades are nice because it requires no I/O rewiring. In and out during those jobs :)
Reply to
Ursa Major
The client is using CitectSCADA thru the RS232 port - so you need a PIC to communicate. I just don't happen to have one lying around... and that's a pain in the butt.
Very true.. In this case: 1) the client was putting in a CLogix elsewhere on their plant, 2) the SLC had already grown to an extra rack in a box on top of the PLC cabinet that was hard to get to (no room anywhere else) - the CLogix chassis is more compact, did you notice that?, 3) replacing the CLogix meant they didn't have to carry SLC spares as well as maintain RSLogix500 *and* 5000 and 4) I didn't think about it (and neither did the AB sales guy ;-).
Cameron:-)
Reply to
Cameron Dorrough
Well .. fortunenaly or unfortunenaly it was never passed by me what the costing on systems were. All I have had to do is spec out what. Or had it specd' for me and had to work with them. I'll say that servo control is a bit easier with the contrologix than with the SLC's
Most of the AB suppliers would be glad to price out systems..
st
Reply to
St
I would like to thank all of you for the post you made in this thread. I have heard that Clogix is about 40-100% more than a silimilar SLC 500. It is nice to know that the newer technology makes life easier when implenting servos. I will assume that this is also the case with process control systems. Again, thanks for all the input.
MZE
St wrote:
Reply to
mze

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.