Digital standards ... international??

When the US decided on the digital TV standard did they pick one that is universal across the globe or did we just create another PAL vs
NTSC debacle?
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
snipped-for-privacy@aol.com wrote:

Debacle.
8VSB vs QAM in this case.
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto: snipped-for-privacy@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
snipped-for-privacy@aol.com writes:

US decided to use their own digital TV standard ATSC.
European countries designed their own DVB standard set for digital TV.
They are basically at least as different as the old PAL vs NTSC issue. There are many techniques on those pretty similar (for example MPEG2 video compression) and many things different (used modulation, supported image resolutions etc..).
--
Tomi Engdahl (http://www.iki.fi/then /)
Take a look at my electronics web links and documents at
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:
| snipped-for-privacy@aol.com writes: | |> When the US decided on the digital TV standard did they pick one that |> is universal across the globe or did we just create another PAL vs |> NTSC debacle? | | US decided to use their own digital TV standard ATSC. | | European countries designed their own DVB standard set | for digital TV. | | They are basically at least as different as the old | PAL vs NTSC issue. There are many techniques on those | pretty similar (for example MPEG2 video compression) | and many things different (used modulation, supported | image resolutions etc..).
It part, the difference in the way TV is broadcast over the air influenced the choice of OTA broadcast modulation. Europe typically has lots of low power transmitters scattered in a lot of small area locations. The US has fewer big transmitters that cover wide areas.
The 8VSB modulation has a lower ratio of peak power to average power. That makes it more suitable for higher power transmitters where the cost of the "head room" for waveform peaks can be great. The COFDM modulation has a higher ratio of peak power to average power, making it more suitable for the lower power transmitters. 8VSB generally performs better better in weak signal situations against "white" noise. COFDM generally performs better in situations involving multiple reflections of the same signal. Both systems have been improved greatly to the point where, had the tests been done with such improvement, the results may have been different. But what is done is done. BTW, cable TV in the US uses QAM which in many ways will perform like 8VSB.
It would be nice if MPEG4 could be retrofitted to ATSC. I've heard that is under consideration. It will require upgrades to home TV decoders to be able to receive it. My guess is, if the FCC approves the use of MPEG4, it will be optional to use. Stations would have the choice to trade getting more programs per MHz and not being receivable by some number of households that receive TV over the air ... vs ... fewer programs per MHz and being recievable by all the digital TV tuners.
I would have preferred to see ATSC adopt the European frame rates int the standard, in addition to all that are there now. That way when playing a program originating in Europe, it could be broadcast at the native frame rate. Being able to handle 25 and 50 fps would be trivial.
--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.