# Frequency-to-voltage and visa versa at 1.602 × 10^- 19 volt.

wrote in http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/90cf40e26172180f?hl =en :

Well, the voltage is not exactly 1.602 × 10^-19 but close. Right?

r
If 1.602 × 10^-19 volt is too small, then what is the smallest physically-possible voltage that can be detected or processed given the state of today's technology?
Add pictures here
âœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
GreenXenon wrote:
...

First learn the difference between an electron-volt and a volt. Then explain why your question happens to assume a voltage that is numerically equal to the charge on an electron. An answer to your question will make more sense to you if you can do that. Asi it is, you're just using words that you don't understand to imply assertions that aren't valid.
Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Add pictures here
âœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Jerry Avins wrote:

Please don't feed the 'Radium' troll.
--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

Add pictures here
âœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:49:48 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"

Jeez, is that who this dumbfuck greenbabyshithead is?
Add pictures here
âœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

Ok. What is the smallest physically-possible voltage that can be detected or processed given the state of today's technology?
The maximum voltage I prefer is 0.56 because that is the max one can get *without*:
1. Exceeding the dielectric strength of any electronic component
2. Generating temperatures above 70 Fahrenheit in any electronic component
3. Ionizing any electronic component
Add pictures here
âœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

0.56 volts at 1000 amp equals 560 watts, which will get most anything warmer than 70 F.
Babbling, trolling idiot.
--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
Add pictures here
âœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
wrote:

Easy. If the background temperature is 70 F, then 0 Watts.
Charles Perry P.E.
Add pictures here
âœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:01:27 -0700 (PDT), GreenXenon

Ever heard of a femtovolt?
Your FM receiver antenna picks up about 2 or 3 femtovolts from the airwaves. That ends up getting tuned in as your stereo media source.
quoted:
The SI derived unit for voltage is the volt. 1 volt is equal to 1.0E+15 femtovolt.
Now stop being a cross posting retard when you make these stupid queries that you are even too dumb to do a simple research hunt for.
Add pictures here
âœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

You need to say that with a John Wayne inflection, as in:
"Yer jus' spittin' out words to see where they splatter..."
Add pictures here
âœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

Zero watts.
--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
Add pictures here
âœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:45:02 GMT, snipped-for-privacy@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

Well, not quite. Zero watts won't _raise_ the temperature at all. ;-)
Add pictures here
âœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

Correct, and it is the only power level guaranteed not to exceed 70 F based on the conditions of the question, and there aren't any.
--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
Add pictures here
âœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

## Site Timeline

Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.