It is OBVIOUS. (eer)

Eer is obvious.

I have battled with experts for many years about it, and taken deserved lumps for my lack of math to back it up.

But, eer is just plain obvious. To miss it would be a shame - we NEED it.

We can collect energy from the sun, the wind, waves, tides, etc.

We can STORE that energy - and there is such an unlimited supply of sources, that losses are not a problem.

We have technology for electric cars, and electricity has long been our way of distributing energy for other energy needs.

Frank

It is OBVIOUS. (eer)

Eer is obvious.

I have battled with experts for many years about it, and taken deserved lumps for my lack of math to back it up.

But, eer is just plain obvious. To miss it would be a shame - we NEED it.

We can collect energy from the sun, the wind, waves, tides, etc.

We can STORE that energy - and there is such an unlimited supply of sources, that losses are not a problem.

We have technology for electric cars, and electricity has long been our way of distributing energy for other energy needs.

Frank

in article snipped-for-privacy@mb-m26.news.cs.com, FEerguy9 at snipped-for-privacy@cs.com wrote on 11/3/03 8:17 AM:

If you want to silence your critics, including me, merely make a working model. One percent efficiency will do for a demonstration.

Bill

Too much work.

Frank

But spamming the Usenet isn't. ...go figgure kidz.

Okay - here is my working model.

Pick up a lump of coal, and just modernize it in your mind.

Best I can do.

Frank