This one goes out to Putyourspamhere:
There can be locks that are 'high security' without being 'UL-437
Why you are unwilling to admit this I don't understand...
For one example Schlage Primus can be ordered either way...
What you have done is attack not my points that I have made... NO... You
like attacking me... Well this is the time to either 'put up or shut up' I
would like you to go talk to a houseplant then... Because I won't go
away... I made a point and you seem to be more interested in attacking me
than defending your point of view or industry standards...
You still have not proven that Best I/C are NOT 'high security'... I said
that it is relative... You said no it wasn't... Some others here have
voiced opinions going both ways... You are not THE VOICE of the entire
I think that you are unreasonable because you never ever read or considered
what I asked you to do in the other threads... Did you ever define a
'scale' of security ??? NO... Did you ever list something to prove that
Best is not 'relatively higher security' than other locks ??? NO... So
yes -- under the currently industry definition of 'high security' anything
better than the 'bottom tier' of locks would have a high level of
security... That is common sense... But rather than prove a point on this
you keep harping on this UL standard which is not the only way to determine
locks... Perhaps you should consider such UL approved locks as 'HIGHEST
You have not WON nor LOST this argument... Neither have I... You just
don't like that a 'non-registered non-professional' pointed out that your
definitions have been built on a shaky foundation... Please don't knock me
for doing that... Because then I will have to start knocking on you and I
am willing to bet that I am better at certain things than you are...
Evan the maintenance man
- posted 18 years ago