This one goes out to Putyourspamhere:
There can be locks that are 'high security' without being 'UL-437 approved'...
Why you are unwilling to admit this I don't understand...
For one example Schlage Primus can be ordered either way...
What you have done is attack not my points that I have made... NO... You like attacking me... Well this is the time to either 'put up or shut up' I would like you to go talk to a houseplant then... Because I won't go away... I made a point and you seem to be more interested in attacking me than defending your point of view or industry standards...
You still have not proven that Best I/C are NOT 'high security'... I said that it is relative... You said no it wasn't... Some others here have voiced opinions going both ways... You are not THE VOICE of the entire locksmithing industry...
I think that you are unreasonable because you never ever read or considered what I asked you to do in the other threads... Did you ever define a 'scale' of security ??? NO... Did you ever list something to prove that Best is not 'relatively higher security' than other locks ??? NO... So yes -- under the currently industry definition of 'high security' anything better than the 'bottom tier' of locks would have a high level of security... That is common sense... But rather than prove a point on this you keep harping on this UL standard which is not the only way to determine locks... Perhaps you should consider such UL approved locks as 'HIGHEST SECURITY'...
You have not WON nor LOST this argument... Neither have I... You just don't like that a 'non-registered non-professional' pointed out that your definitions have been built on a shaky foundation... Please don't knock me for doing that... Because then I will have to start knocking on you and I am willing to bet that I am better at certain things than you are...
Evan the maintenance man