In the post copied below I discussed tying together nanotubes to get arbitrarily long nanotubes. If simply tied together, the longer nanotube would be weaker but note even if many short segments were tied together the resulting decrease in strength would still be only the same fraction as when two segments were tied together. That is, if the tensional strength decreased to 60% of a single nanotube when two were tied together, the tensional strength for when 1 million nanotubes were tied together end-to-end would still be 60% of a single nanotube. Note then that the tensional strength of nanotubes is so markedly higher than other materials the strength of these tied together nanotubes would still be significantly higher than other materials. This page gives measured strengths of some common knots:
The Most Useful Rope Knots for the Average Person to Know
These small diameter nanotubes would have to be tied into knots. So a means of manipulating them at the nanoscale would be required. Firstly, nanotubes at centimeter lengths have been formed, as described in the Science article "Direct Synthesis of Long Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Strands" I cited below. Another research team has also created centimeter long nanotubes:
Extra-long carbon nanotubes set new record
20 September 2004Then their lengths is not a problem for forming into knots, just their small diameters for manipulation purposes. The "Direct Synthesis of Long Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Strands" paper notes the 20 cm long nanotubes were aligned into approx. 10-20 nm diameter ropes. The authors make a distinction between *strands* of the nanotubes which were in the 10 micron diameter range and *ropes* in the 10-20 nanometer diameter range. The key distinction is that their measurements of the strand's strengths show only a small fraction of that estimated for nanotubes. The reason is that these are not formed from nanotubes all the same length. They are formed from a conglomeration of nanotubes of varying lengths. Then the forces holding them together are just van der Waals forces, rather than the carbon-carbon bonds of nanotubes. In such a case holding a strand at both ends and pulling allows the separate nanotubes to peel apart. This is described on the page "Pulling nanotubes makes thread" I cited below. However, it is the researchers opinion that the *ropes* are formed of nanotubes formed all the same length. Then presumably their tensile strength would be the same as the individual nanotubes. Note then that devices do exist that can manipulate items at the tens of nanometers scale:
Nanotube Nanotweezers. Science, Vol. 286, No. 5447, p. 2148-2150, 10 December 1999
Ring Closure of Carbon Nanotubes. Science, Vol. 293, No. 5533, p. 1299-1301, 17 August 2001
Interestingly, the method of knotting the nanotubes together or binding them by rings might also be applied to the strands, that is, to the case where the nanotubes are of different lengths held together by van der Waals forces. You would note the shortest length of the nanotubes composing a strand and tie knots around the strand or bind it with a rings at short enough intervals to insure that every nanotube is held tightly with a tie or knot at least once all along the length of the strand. Note then there have been several reported cases of nanotube strands or ribbons macroscopically long but much weaker than individual nanotubes because they are held together by van der Waals forces. Then this method of binding them at short intervals may provide a means of recovering close to the full strength of the individual nanotubes. Another question that would need to be answered is how binding together a group of equally long nanotubes effects the strength of the nanotubes when the binding is only going around the outer nanotubes. That is, suppose you created a string made from *individual* nanotubes bound end-to-end and measured the string's strength. Then you composed a string by using nanotube ropes that all contained the same number of nanotubes, say 100, and bound these ropes end-to-end. Would the string composed of the ropes be able to hold 100 times as much as the string composed of individual nanotubes? This is asking a somewhat different question than how knotting weakens the nanotubes. It's asking how strong a composed string will be when a binding can only go around the outer nanotubes composing the string.
Bob Clark
************************************************************ Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics, sci.space.policy, sci.materials From: snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com (Robert Clark) Date: 29 Aug 2004 08:01:49 -0700 Local: Sun,Aug 29 2004 11:01 am Subject: Can we now build the space elevator?=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=AD=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D From: Robert Clark ( snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...) Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.space.policy, sci.materials, sci.energy Date: 2004-06-09 02:06:53 PST
h= snipped-for-privacy@spsystems.net (Henry Spencer) wrote in message ...
Tie? Hmmm. Do you think it might work to tie the ends together of the 20 centimeter long nanotubes already produced? Looking up some links on knots, the knotted ropes always have less strength than the single, unbroken ropes. I confirmed this by testing on sewing thread. Still it might be interesting to find out how strong they are compared to single nanotubes.
Bob Clark =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=AD=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Testing with thread confirmed that a break always occurred where two strands were tied together. However, to estimate the strength of a single strand of thread, I wrapped two ends around my fingers and found that the break occurred in the middle of the thread, not where I was holding the thread. My guess was that the softness of my fingers prevented the thread from breaking at the attachment point (where I was holding it.) I confirmed this by holding one end by a pair of pliers and the other end with my fingers. The break occurred where the pliers held the thread. However, when I put a soft cloth between the thread and the pliers, the break occurred in the middle of the thread, as when I was holding both ends with my fingers. I imagine this must actually be a common way of testing tensile strength. That is, you don't want to attach the strand or rope to something that will make the rope break at the attachment point. This would give an invalid measure of the rope strength. You want it to break somewhere in the middle. I therefore suggest connecting together the already produced 20 centimeter long nanotubes with a soft material or by whatever means used to insure nanotubes don't break at the attachment point during tensile strength testing. This will allow the full strength of the nanotubes to be maintained even when they are connected together. What will need to be investigated is what soft material will also be light enough so as not to cancel out the weight savings of using the nanotubes. Note that this soft material might be heavier than the nanotube material but because it only has to be used at the connections it can be quite small so quite conceivable may only add minimally to total weight. It still needs to be confirmed that the macroscopic sized nanotubes really are as strong as the nanotubes tested on the microscale. This report showed that 20 centimeter interwoven strands were significantly weaker than the tested individual microscale nanotubes:
Direct Synthesis of Long Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Strands. Science, Vol 296, Issue 5569, 884-886 , 3 May 2002
Pulling nanotubes makes thread
What still needs to be tested is the strength of the *individual* nanotubes that make up these 20 centimeter long strands.
This article describes a group that proposes that competively offered prizes could make possible the technologies required for the space elevator by 2010:
Space elevator contest proposed. 'Elevator:2010' aimed at encouraging technology development.
Bob Clark
************************************************************