Subject: tentative-proof that Fiberglass is relatively harmless Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:05:39 -0500 From: Archimedes Plutonium Reply-To: NOdtgEMAIL Organization: whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies Newsgroups: sci.materials, sci.environment
Last I heard of fiberglass as a potential carcinogen was that Germany researchers and Europe was implicating fiberglass as a carcinogen but that the results were preliminary.
I am going to offer a sort of commonsense approach to the question of whether fiberglass is a carcinogen or not. I suppose anything in overexcess or overquantity is harmful. But the fact is that fiberglass is silica which is that of "sand" and humans have been in close contact with sand in the environment for as old as human species itself.
So the commonsense argument would be that if fiberglass is carcinogenic is almost tantamount to saying that people who live where sand dust is blown around is a carcinogenic environment.
The body has means of getting rid of sand, unlike asbestos that once inside the body is almost impossible to get it out. And sand does not cut up the cells unlike the sharp fibers of asbestos.
The commonsense argument in favor of fiberglass is that lungs have evolved for 10s or even 100s of millions of years to deal with sand intake into the body and since fiberglass is a form of sand, then it should be relatively harmless.
Archimedes Plutonium, a snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies