dynamic behaviour of lighting columns

In the calculation of lighting columns, you must take dynamic behaviour into account. It's done by a factor on the wind loads, that depends on the period of vibration of the column. The European EN 40 standard committee says this period must lie between 0 and 3.5 seconds.

the standard: " ... factor .... takes into account the increase in the load resulting from the dynamic behaviour of the lighting column cause by wind gusts".

Now, when I calculate the period of vibration of a 6 meter pole-with- bracket by means of matrix method (eigenvalue problem with distributed mass matrix) I get LOWEST eigenvalues that result in maximum periods of vibration way higher than 3.5 seconds, and a load factor that is unacceptably high (and not in line with experience).

The questions: Which eigenvalue should I use to determin the period of vibration ? (A column has A LOT of eigenfrequencies...) How should the relation with "wind gusts" be interpreted ?

Here is the array of typical eigenvalues from my calculation: array(24) { [1]=> float(1.81673652086) [2]=> float(1.82377482274) [3]=> float(41.8565929569) [4]=> float(43.8413395721) [5]=> float(138.031662251) [6]=> float(233.428272113) [7]=> float(519.636228268) [8]=> float(710.793797493) [9]=> float(2776.57589519) [10]=> float(4218.21507698) [11]=> float(8078.78449371) [12]=> float(9531.15538271) [13]=> float(11888.6098069) [14]=> float(18685.6311882) [15]=> float(24678.9208868) [16]=> float(25294.8476091) [17]=> float(40684.7831304) [18]=> float(73070.7945844) [19]=> float(83898.8774131) [20]=> float(95870.9738707) [21]=> float(137719.85692) [22]=> float(277530.743338) [23]=> float(368154.480533) [24]=> float(633315.738033) }

(So the eigenfrequencies in rad/s are the sqrt from these values.)

Reply to
Osiris
Loading thread data ...

I am certainly missing something, using your values and method. Start with array[1] = 1.82 sqrt (1.82) = 1.35 rad/s

1.35 X 2pi = 8.5 Hz

array(25) ??????? = 633316 sqrt(633316) = 796 rad/s

796 X 2pi = 5kHz

??? Brian Whatcott Altus OK

Reply to
Brian Whatcott

I certainly was missing something:

1.35 rad/s = 0.21 Hz T = 4.7 sec

...and so on

[Please don't tell me I screwed up twice running :-)

Brian W

Reply to
Brian Whatcott

yeah, sure... That part I knew... but before that, I have to **choose** one for the determination of the load factor. Which one ?

for one: all eigenvalues are related to a degree of freedom. Wind is in the z-direction, so I only consider those eigenvalues related to that z-direction, right ? But only translation along the z-axis or the ones related to rotation about the x-axis too (this rotation results in a displacement along the z-axis) ? Then, why should I use the **lowest** eigenfrequency ? Why is that one related to the worst-case scenario ?

Reply to
Osiris

Ddear Osiris:

This will carry the most energy, generate the highest displacement (before column failure), and is closest to the forcing function ("near zero"). If you knew you had a forcing function near 5 kHz, then you could look for harmonics there. (Say you were supporting or stabilizing an engine...)

David A. Smith

Reply to
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)

thnx. What about the karman-frequency then ?

Reply to
Osiris

I can't help you here. Sorry.

David A. Smith

Reply to
dlzc

-

I'll take a shot at this.... If a rough empirical equation for vortext shedding frequency is given by F = 0.2V/d

For F = frequency V = air speed d = pole diameter

Then a low wind speed corresponds with the lowest vortex shedding frequencies. (Unsurprisingly!) But low wind speeds carry the lowest energy, so for a pole's limiting structural stiffness (expressed as a resonance frequency which should be higher than some limit value, which implies a limiting periodic time which should be shorter than some limit value) a wind speed low enough to excite a pole resonance via vortex shedding, will have insufficient energy to cause damage.

Brian Whatcott Altus OK

Reply to
Brian Whatcott

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.