proper way to use a lock washer?

Wikipedia ruins everything. I was expecting a big argument to start.

Well, I'd say it depends...for instance, a soft washer with a large diameter (fender washer) likely would provide more friction against the material being bolted and so I have to at least partially disagree with wiki on this..

It depends on the need.

If you are locking a nut to the base metal it is locking to - use s star / split / double star / spring etc then the nut or a washer and a nut. The washer spreads the presser across the nut and allows it to rotate freely.

If you are trying to lock the nut and the thread then you are trying to put side pressure on the nut....

Sometimes it is two nuts together with a washer.

Many uses.

Mart> >>> When using a nut, lock washer and bolt, should you also use a flat

Despite what wiki says, I frequently use (and see used) a split lock washer between a nut/bolt head and a flat washer. Even though it isn't going to "bite" into the object being held or the nut/bolt head, it still provides a longitudinal force to help keep it from becoming unfastened.

Jon

It may be worth a more extensive search. A mechanical engineer I know, whose a very sharp guy, told me that someone did a study and determined that split washers work because they act as springs that keep the tension on the threads in one direction.

Wikipedia is not always a reliable source.

There are numerous views regarding the in/effectiveness of split style lockwashers.

One sure way to be certain is to use the proper Loctite or similar thread locking product. Another option is to use nylock or other types of self-locking nuts.. although this may be more costly than threadlocking products, and some types are considered OTU one-time-use only.

Then edit the page so that it is more reliable...

Some simply consider split ring washers to be the work of the devil.

I found this looking for a more extensive set of videos of bolts loosening, and the test rig used.

On 6/7/2013 1:39 PM, snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com wrote: ...

I didn't watch the rest; I notice they didn't say anything about the torque applied on the test. Didn't appear to me it was more than just "snugged down" rather than really torqued, but who's to know--they cleverly didn't the applicator so can't even judge by looking the amount of effort or size of ratchet, etc. While it may have been optical delusion, looked to me like the bolt turned as well which wouldn't indicate being very tight.

I don't have any scientific evidence but 50+ yr practical use on farm indicates to me they serve a useful purpose.

I was impressed by this test at first, but then I realized looking at the graph (

) that the major difference occurs only after the bolt is already too loose. The plots diverge only after the bolt has already lost half its preload. They really need to concentrate on the very first part of the curve where the bolt starts to loosen. If you look closely, there is some indication one curve is much steeper than the other at the start, but it is impossible to tell which it is. Maybe they need to dial back the shaking a bit to be able to measure that part of the curve better.

(following up to my own post) What would be best would be to create a set of curves like this at several vibration amplitudes and see if there is some level of vibration where the lockwasher prevents any loosening, but the plain nut does not.

hers

Wikipedia ruins everything. I was expecting a big argument to start.

I'm not a reliable enough source, either. I was advising the OP to look around and make up his own mind, not to believe what I said without question.

If I needed to know I'd do a literature search -- starting, I admit, by looking up my old mechanical engineering colleague, to see if he could remember where he saw the note (I think it was NASA tech briefs. NASA was doing all sorts of studies in that vein for a while).

That's the rcm way! I was hoping someone would do my thread justice.

The Book of Gunner (in the Old Testament; one of the lost books) relates:

1. And at the early moment of dawn, on the sixth day of the week. The chariots were heard in the distance. My best look out came back into camp, and reported that the enemy had amassed 500 chariots with warriors and boys to assist.
2. My look outs from the high towers reported that behind the chariots were amazing multitudes of busty and nubile women, both nobles and wenches, and girls too young to have been married off to the warriors of the opposing realm. And they had heard that I, Gunner, was legenday and unstoppable in the bedroom, after having bilateral angio venoplasty paid for by the tax payers of California, to treat my years of self inflicted cigar smoking and drinking of whiskey.
3. I called heartily with booming and resonant voice (only coughing a couple times account of the cigar) to my trumpeter, to rally my men, to sound the charge. We had only 200 chariots with warriors, boys, and small number of busty women, the remainder of the women were slumbering in exhaustion after the bedroom epic drama of last night.
4. My chariots went into battle, and the fight was extreme. In the heat of the battle, the opposing chariots wheels all came off, as if on signal. Mine rallied and fought to the end, as I had used my lathe, and hydraulic stamping press to generate suitably sized lock washers, to hold the wheels on. (Can be seen, item #2814, on 55 tools blogspot, hosted by Rob H.)

Aristotole say (or was it Confucious) man without lock washer have loose nuts.

That's the rcm way! I was hoping someone would do my thread justice.

That's the rcm way! I was hoping someone would do my thread justice.

Most of the applications I have, I'd go with farm experience rather than a web site that claims this or that.

I don't have any scientific evidence but 50+ yr practical use on farm indicates to me they serve a useful purpose.

...

Quite a lot...a wide variety of applications have adjusting slots for depth settings, etc., that have flat washers to span the slot and lock washer on top. Works fine...

Again, for the application. I can imagine one can find vibration regimes/applications where it doesn't suffice.