Thinking About Scrapping the Hurco Mill

I retrofit it, and I rebuilt it, and I repaired it many times. It still functions, but its in desperate need of repairs again. Both the X & Y have excessive backlash. The Y is just old and worn out, but the X probably needs a whole new ball screw assembly. In the middle of a job it went from about .001 backlash to about .035 backlash. I'm sure could sell the servo motors and the quill easily enough. The rest, who knows.

I had been still using it for roughing blanks for use on the smaller machines. Basically entering code one line at a time to do functional manual milling using conventional only to take up backlash and measuring the parts. Its usable that way. I'd been using it that way for quite a while. Here is the thing though. I can slightly more easily do that dame job on the new (last year) South Bend knee mill and it will make cuts the Hurco will balk at, choke, ship weld, and break an end mill trying. The South Bend has a modern 3 phase 5hp motor being powered with a 7.5HP VFD proper power and current program for the motor. It gives me pretty darn close to a real usable 5HP based on some of the crazy cuts I've made with it. Trust me when I say I do more work with the manual knee mill than with the CNC knee mill now... because its just faster.

Basically every time I fix its more than a minor little thing, and it works great for a couple months until something else craps out, and I just don't use it. I've got two smallish lathes I could put there and get more use of the space and take up less space. I do use the lathes, although the smaller one may also be on its way out if I don't decide to CNC it. On top of that I am working on a bridge mill that will do more of the type of work I do on a daily basis, and at the moment I do not have a place to put it. Of course power in my shop is an issue as well. When I built the shop it was just supposed to be a warehouse. I figured the 100 amp sub panel I put on it was way overkill. Well, not I am constantly bearing that electrical capacity budget in my head while running machines. What the peak "could" be and what the real load "probably" is. If I eliminate the Hurco I can use its budget allocation for the new bridge mill I am building.

I don't know. Just thinking. Just another one of the thoughts that probably kept me out of the good schools.

Reply to
Bob La Londe
Loading thread data ...

Sell off the good parts you don't need and scrap it. Your other machines will thank you. ANd you'll thank yourself too. There comes a time when a machine nickels and dimes you to death (death by a thousand cuts?) and it's time to do what you now know you should have done fefore you dixed it last time. You've passed the point of diminishing returns or you wouldn't even be admitting to the thought -

- - -

Reply to
Clare Snyder

It actually takes care of another problem for me. The new (year old now) South Bend mill needs a better vise on the table. I threw an old Enco (I think its Enco) vise on the table, but its not great. 6 inch jaws only opens 5.9 inches. Oops. Not particularly parallel. Its ok for quick work and to be honest I only threw it on the table for one quick job 11 months ago. I'd been debating buying a couple 6 or 8 inch vises to go on it. I have a pair (*) of 8 inch Shars vises on the table for the Hurco. One or both of them would sure be handy on the South Bend.

(*) The Shars vises have been pretty good, but they say not to use them as matched pairs due to height variance from one to the next. When I used them as a pair I almost always put the part in the machined in place step jaws, so that was never an issue. Shars still sells their signature name, but now they also sell Kurt and Tegara.

Reply to
Bob La Londe

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.