Utility District believes in perpetual motion

Jan 13, 2009 20 Replies

"Ned Simmons" wrote: If pipeline's high point is higher than the second lake (for example,

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I see only two possibilities: 1.) The OP is confused about what they are doing. 2.) Ned Simmons is correct.

I believe it must by #2. If they have to pump the water over a hill more than 32 feet high, it will not be possible to just run it as a siphon and recover the energy--hence, a proposed power plant at the low point.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required