On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 21:05:34 GMT, Ted Edwards vaguely proposed a theory ......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email
Well all I can say is that reading these posts, my radius of gyration is becoming increasingly small, but my speed is being maintained. In the end my brain will probably exceed Yield Stress!
I do have to say that you guys may be arguing at cross purposes. I _thought_ that Ed was saying that tube stiffness is not the only thing. Wall thickness is important as well, because that will prevent buckling under certain circumstances.
I am trying to learn here, from minds that scare my dilettante little brain!
AFAICS the argument revolves around the fact that you can keep the same wall thickness or even nincrease it, using aluminium, and use a larger diameter tube to achieve the stiffness. You in fact need to do this.
Having a smaller diameter tube would presumably make a given wall thickness less likely to buckle. That feels right to me.
But would a steel tube of small diameter, having the _same weight_ as a larger tube of aluminium, have as strong a _wall_ as the alum one?
If you thinned the walls of the steel pipe, in order to allow a larger diameter for the same weight, the walls would _not_ be as strong as an aluminium tube of the same weight as the thin-walled steel one, with wall thickness strengthening as a cube of the thickness (?) while weight is linear. Looking at the wall as a bar of steel, aluminium would be stiffer than the same _weight_ bar of steel. (?????)
Hope I am saying this in a way that can be understood. trying to avoid having to learn a whole dgree's worth of engineering terms and conditions, by using gut feeling and laymen's terms.