Scratch-built balsa biplane takes to the air

Nov 09, 2026 Last reply: 2 hours ago 3 Replies
Jump to replies (3)

The number that jumped out at me was the flying weight: 800 grams ready to fly, battery included, on a 900mm balsa biplane. For a scratch-built Pitts-style machine with two wings and wheels under it, that seems remarkably light to me, and it shows in how smoothly the first flight went.



The airframe comes from laser-cut balsa, worked up from a simplified take on the classic Pitts design. AviPlanes covered it in Doculam and Japanese tissue, and the finish choices really stand out: a red and white sunburst pattern radiating across the upper wing and tail surfaces, red interplane struts linking the two wings, a solid red nose section, and a semi-translucent white film over the rear fuselage. That translucent tail end is my favourite part of the look.



Electronics are a Turnigy Graphene 1500mAh 3S LiPo, four SAVÖX SH-0257MG servos, a Futaba R7008SB receiver, an AXI 2208/34 motor, a Robbe 40A ESC and a light-coloured 9x5 prop at the nose. Before flying, the battery slides in through a hatch on the underside, the pack voltage gets checked with a handheld digital tester, and the motor and control surfaces are tested with the plane sitting upright on its wheels.



The maiden flight went well: a run down a dirt path, then banking turns, flybys and rolls before touching down on the grass and taxiing. Flight time came out near 8 minutes with about 2 minutes held in reserve. The trade-off is power, as the setup feels slightly underpowered and the aircraft still needs a little more trimming, and the maker plans to test different propellers for a better match. The laser-cut dxf files are also being shared, which strikes me as a generous move.



Project by AviPlanes. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


The semi-translucent white over the rear fuselage looks like the smartest finish call to me. It lets the structure show through, and against the solid red nose and the sunburst wings the whole airframe reads properly classic. Tissue back there on a plane already at 800 grams ready to fly seems a fair trade.

Since the current setup feels a touch underpowered, I would love to know whether testing different propellers means going up in diameter or trying a different pitch first. Either route seems worth a shot before changing anything else on the power system.

Given the roughly 8 minutes flown with about 2 minutes in reserve, I would suggest trying the propeller swaps before considering a bigger pack. A better matched prop might wake the plane up without adding weight, and at 800 grams all up that weight margin looks precious to me.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required