All I know is...

Replied to what question? You began a new thread, there is no question.

What question was that you dick? 8-)

ANything I say along those lines is usually a reaction to the obvious.

We know.

Not a new thread, just a different subject under the "Effects of Vibrations..."

| > ...that everyone who replied to this question actually GAVE AN | > ANSWER!!!!! WHAT??!! No politics, backstabbing or threats | > of prison sex?! | >

| > Huh, PHIL??!! :-)>

| >

| | Replied to what question? You began a new thread, there is no question. | |

Just what you'd expect from a Democrat!

It became a new thread when the subject line was replaced.

We called those types of folks "Component Engineers" and they tended to be more on the low keyed side of the curve.

It was the folks in the shop breathing all of those funny solvents that were the wild ones... :-)

Andy

Click the reference link... the subject line was changed, but the message was a reply to the "effects of vibration on capacitors" question.

-dave w

That's to much work. That should have been in there.

Which makes it a new thread.

Can't you people find anything sillier about which to argue?

Some browser use the references line, rather than the subject line to determine what thread a post is a part of.

Mine has options to "sort by reference threading" or "sort by subject line"... At which point the definition of what exactly constitutes a "new thread" or a "new topic" becomes a bit moot.

-dave w

Nice. I imagine that could be useful.