BT-70 classics

Dave, The simple way is to use a sawed-off, spent 18mm case as the adapter. The T motors will usually friction fit fine, sometimes a wrap or two of tape is needed.

The big problem you'll have right now is not blowing it up. The current

1/2A motors have pretty hot ejection charges. I haven't witnessed it with any full-A T-motors, so those may be OK. And I doubt you really want to fly it on composite 18mm short motors :)

Doug

Reply to
Doug Sams
Loading thread data ...

Well, here's one I did.

formatting link
It uses the stock BMS cone. It crashed on its inaugural flight at NARAM last summer. The upper stage E9 didn't light. At this size, it's a little slow off the rod. This is when I wished Estes had a large core D motor (~D40) to really kick it off the rod.

I've also thought about integrating some

13mm MMTs into another booster for getting it up more quickly.

I suppose an E30 to an airstarted E9 shoulda/coulda been a consideration.

The nosecone was smashed, but I rebuilt it. The booster suffered a pretty good ding (unrelated to the crash) and has been repaired.

I was able to salvage everything from the upper stage except the tube. The rings and MMT assembly were re-used in the repaired rocket along with the fins. I just need to add some paint and it will be good as new.

Doug

Reply to
Doug Sams

Close. In addition to smaller ID, the LOC's OD is also larger. BT-70 2.175" 2.217" LOC BT-2.14 2.14" 2.26"

Bob, for HPR I agree. I hate seeing folks 'glassing stuff when there's already a suitable tube available. LOC's 2.56" tube is a perfect example. With its

0.035" wall, it's perfect for use in place of 'glassed BT-80. I much prefer to spend a few bucks and save a couple hours.

As for the LOC 2.14" tube, I'm torn. With its 0.060" wall it's really a motor tube. It's fine for that, and for HPR airframe, but it's really heavy for lesser applications - ie, mid-power.

That said, there isn't anything (that I'm aware of) in between BT-70 and BT-2.14, so the user would have to glass his own BT-70 I suppose.

Doug

Reply to
Doug Sams

I already posted to this thread USR tube is 2.17 x 2.25 and the data from tests is at

formatting link

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

I heard that a certain teammate of mine bought a set of BMS parts to clone this classic last NARAM...

Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!

Reply to
Bob Kaplow

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.