But weight limits are "acceptable" to you.
Prove me wrong. Eliminate any weight limits on NAR defined model rocket
motors except the total weight limit (125g) and call it the Irvine
unified mass limit.
Oh, and BTW have all NAR members, Vendors, dealers, clubs, test
committees STOP asking for any ATF peermits for ANY propellant actuated
devices per 27 CFR 55.141-a-8 pending the outcome of the lawsuit and
pending the very first ATF enforcement action ever.
Moron for NAR President. It has already been made so.
Jerry
yep
apart from the arbitrary weight limit which does nothing to increase
security or safety, the use of the undefined terms "recreational model
rocket" and "model rocket motor" can by interpretation by the
regulating body (ATFE) reduce exempted rocketry to cardboard and balsa
rockets using single-use motors.
this is [emphatically] unacceptable
- iz
So, of course, since we didn't get exactly what we wanted the very
first time we tried we should just throw up our hands and go home.
Forget about contacting Senators or trying to work with the House
version. It's foolish to even try.
I live my life that way too. If things don't go completely my way the
first time I try something I just give up. That's a good policy to
follow in everything, especially dating, stocks, and legislation.
There, did I get it right?
I sure am glad Bunny is working on this and not you.
Rocket Flyer
Southeast Georgia
Given that we still don't have answers to all the questions created by the
Hatchet/Coleslaw version which could even regulate what is currently
unregulated, I'd have to agree with Jerry.
Pass the original Enzi bill. Nothing less is acceptable.
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
>>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!
Where does it leave us if the house version is as bad as the Hatchet /
Coleslaw version? Or worse?
Passing this bill as it is surrenders both our lawsuit and our challenges to
the BATF NPRM. Without it we're one judicial decision away from freedom.
With it we're dead.
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
>>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!
What a crock of s@#$. Name me one company that's pushing the SEA. It's
the scared sheeple that are being soothed by this ridiculous law, not
big business.
Mark Simpson
NAR 71503 Level II
God Bless our peacekeepers
You keep posting this crap, and I keep refuting it.
This legislation has been reviewed by our legal team working on the
litigation.
They have counseled both TRA President Dick Embry and I that it does
not impact the ongoing litigation.
How many times do I have to keep saying this before you get it?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Mark B. Bundick mbundick - at - earthlink - dot - net
NAR President
I respectifully disagree.
Mike Enzi has already put a tremendous amount of time, energy,
attention and personal political capital into this fight, for which,
to the best of my knowledge, he has received $0.00 in campaign
contributions. I'm not naive enough to suggest that money can't buy
you access and attention, but that's not in play here. And to suggest
that everything that goes on on Capitol Hill is money driven,
particularly in this case, is inaccurate.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Mark B. Bundick mbundick - at - earthlink - dot - net
NAR President
I've posted this before and I'll post it again.
Your choice is simple.
If you want to help preserve our hobby, write a letter today.
If you want to help ATF, do nothing.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Mark B. Bundick mbundick - at - earthlink - dot - net
NAR President
Writing a letter to the senators supporting the original enzi bill with
no mas limits is a good idea. Why not? But considering where the bill
is at right now it will ultimately be futile. And when Wickman calls for
action be sure to do it, because he is the only industry leader
advocating and DEVELOPING unlimited access options.
I would like to go on the record as generally agreeing with Mark Bundick
on this point.
So Mark, what is the status of the lawsuit. Is the next step the final
answer?
Jerry
"Jerry Irvine"
-------
Whoa.. Whoa there big fella...
Anyone who volunteers for anything might be a moron,
but name calling is totally uncalled for. Mr. Bundick is trying
to do something... Which should have merit even if it is not
what you believe.
HDS
Yes, it means one thing. A broken clock is right twice a day, which
is two minutes out of 1440 minutes each day.
Much like the broken clock Jerry can accidentally be right 0.00138% of
the time too. Don't worry, he won't be right again for another 720
post.
Rocket Flyer
Southeast Georgia
NAR paid for it, so that part of it is understandable (ego comment noted
and approved).
I beg him to simply make fewer errors to take blame for!
Big ass point!!
Oh give me a break. You and Bob Kaplow just love that saying. What was
I wrong about? I am curious. Please inform me quick so I can correct
my ways or call you on it. More likely B.
Jerry
Thanks Jerry; you are a wealth of knowledge. -- Richard "well, he is"
Hickok
"I mean, old Mr. Prez is stumbling around like a drunk sailor - violating
the bylaws, folks civil rights, Federal and State Law. You guys might
ought to rein him in, seems to me." - John Cato
"HOWEVER, when organizations are involved in the regulation of a
sport/hobby/etc activity, it seems to me, personally, that there ought
to be at least the same level of openness and oversight as the
government itself is required to demonstrate (which is still not enough,
IMHO, but certainly more than none).
"Sometimes an avocation becomes a passion, and perhaps an obsession.
Perhaps it's a control thing. Or a penchant for secrecy. Or a love of
rules." - Ted Cochran
sadly mark I think Enzy is the Exception to the rule.
a very nice and PROPER exception but and exception nonetheless.
if only more politicians in power were like Enzy this country might not be
heading down the deep dark hole its heading down :-(
Chris Taylor
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.