Does S 724, in fact, kill the court action in its entirety? I am not certain that this is so. Correct me if I am wrong, but is not part of the court action to determine whether or not APCP is, in fact, an explosive? I could be waaaaay off base here, but even with the passing of S 724, I would like to think that the argument as to whether or not APCP is an explosive would remain a valid argument for the courts to decide. And, as a dozen authoritative chemists/physicists would testify, APCP in the composition that we use, is obviously a propellant and NOT an explosive by any stretch of the imagination. As to the other options, I would not care to comment, but I would like to think (and I could be completely incorrect) that the courts would still be prepared to consider the aforementioned question.
In any event, I have decided to get a LEUP, as difficult as it is for me to do so, in order that I may pursue me avocation to its fullest extent.
Murray
>
>>> While no one in the hobby rocket community is happy with the
>> substitute version of S 724, it still appears that the best
>> opportunity to make legislative corrections and adjustments will be in
>> the drafting of a House companion bill. As such, it remains important
>> to get a bill passed out of the Senate so that there can eventually be
>> a House-Senate conference to resolve differences between the bills (if
>> there is no Senate bill, then
>> there can be no conference.)
>
>What do we do if the house passes the same crap as Kohl's law? Or worse?
>Then it's too late to stop it from becoming law. And it then becomes a
>surrender for our other options.
>
> Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
> >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!
> Save Model Rocketry from the HSA!