August 1971: amateurs used 2.3GHz recieving stations of their own
> construction to monitor direct transmissions from the Apollo 15 Command
> Service Module as it circled the moon.
>
>
> Dip Stick
>
> Republicans Retain Majority Of *BOTH* Houses Of Congress!
> No thanks to people like you.....
It is no wonder that Republicans are against science.
What about when they keep the shiney side out?
BTW - this is cross posted all over the place. If people keep replying to all groups, we'll have another Brad like series of posts on our group. Phil
Too late...
Daniel Joseph Min is all over it.
Apollo 11: 22 kg Apollo 12: 34 kg Apollo 14: 43 kg Apollo 15: 77 kg Apollo 16: 95 kg Apollo 17: 111 kg ------ 382 kg Where did the rest come from?
Ya, but can they really reflect the Eureka Death Ray, and if so, how could it target anything besides Eureka?
I think min is so far gone he's beyond the therapeutic effects of foil.
Area 51!
:)
However, a hundred or so layers of plastic wrap (wrapped tightly around his head) might help.
head) might help.
Probably not, I don't think he has any vital organs in his head.
Brad is just a wannabe kook next to Min. ;)
Maybe he could be packed in a tin, like Prince Albert or Charlie Tuna.
That would certainly make Me feel better.
I am a republican. They are hardly 'against' science, just the lunatic junk science like things that cannot even be done with a mouse, violating analytical procedure to hype results, you know, the usual liberal tools.
plonk...
Well that would depend on which Brad you speak of. Around these parts we have to contend with Brad Jesness. THE net kook of the century. A little google action will inspire shock-n-awe.
Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75
Right, watch out for those liberal scientist! What a putz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I sorry, your sentence structure is not possible.
You see you used the term liberal in the present day tense, which has no bases in reality. They believe that the laws of thermal dynamics can be repealed, and feeling good will somehow right all evils.
Scientists develop postulates and theorems, are actively pursuing truth in a subject matter.
Therefore there cannot be a liberal scientist.
Tanya wrote:
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required