Re: CADand Vista

Feb 08, 2007 4 Replies

SolidWorks = -89% Catia = -90% Pro/e = -84.5% UGS NX = -98% UGS Teamcenter = -89.1% Maya = -83.9%



Now, go show those numbers to your engineering manager and CFO!?!?



Ya gotta luv it!?!?!? Cute, really cute!?!?!?! Let's all go out an get that eye candy to run SW, Pro/e, NX,..!?!?!!?



For you all who had the chance to use the Vista beta's and the release as well as use SW on Vista... WHAT A Freaking JOKE, yeah!!!? It's NOT about productivity, it never has been,.. it's about SALES!!!! It's all about putting money in some useless greedy slim bag marketing/sales bastards wallet!! (I feel better now)



(btw, amazing,.. a cross posted link which was related to this forum!?)


>
> >Seems like Vista isn't ready for prime time CAD work:
> >
> >
formatting link

> Others have an abiding interest ....

Let's not freak out yet guys. If anyone has played with the beta version of SW for Vista it clearly states that it has to run with "software OpenGL" so your graphics card is basically taken right out the performance boost. I would imagine by the time SW or any other is "officially" released, the drivers will be writen for the new OS optimization.

Be patient and wait for the developers to tackle the new drivers and optimizations before reading any of these early claims.

Don

hmm,.. what,.. exsqueeze me?

I'm not talking about zooming and spinning a image around the screen, I'm talking about rebuild PERFORMANCE!

Do you understand the difference? I'm not sitting here showing my boss/clients a spin/zoom show, I'm interested and I'm talking about rebuild PERFORMANCE, i.e., producing data.

Ya gotta luv it!!?!?!?!?!?!?!? It's kinda like,.. big government,.. let's add sumore s*it to make it more efficient!!

But, then,... you're right,.. let's wait,....and wait,.....and wait,.....oh,.. maybe in the meanwhile we should upgrade the sys, yeah, a 64 bit sys will do it... no, we need more ram to counter the POOR performance????

Freaking incredible!!?!?!?!?

..

One can always run the Hardware Validation Tool MSoft has to determine if the hardware you have is going to be supported by the drivers and whatnot they come up with.

All this for what? What is the big attraction? That is what I don't get. I compare MSoft operating systems to tornados. You pretty much can't determine where they will hit. You duck and cover when they do and you learn to pick up the pieces later.

When something is "optimized" is is supposed to run faster.

You can't make an emulation layer run faster unless you SERIOUSLY upgrade the hardware. OpenGL on Vista will NEVER be good unless Microsoft implements true OpenGL.

So, yet again, Microsoft hides poor and bloated code with better hardware.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required