Re: Product Review for jb

"Dumb and stupid" is redundant, JB. You're spitting the words out like a punch-drunk fighter spitting out teeth. d8-)

Calm down. Regain your composure. You can think of some wacky reason why you and "Phil" write with the same errors. Maybe he's your long-lost twin, from whom you were separated at birth. That would explain it....

-- Ed Huntress

Why don't you let "Phil" speak for himself, Jon? Maybe he can offer a fresh perspective.

-- Ed Huntress

Well, syntactically, they are worlds apart. Mostly, Ed H writes in cohesive paragraphs, and knits s*it together.

Cliff writes in single sentences, but (cross)posts millions of them, leaving the victim, I mean, the reader to knit s*it together.

Syntax can be deceptive, tho. For example, all's I gotta do remove "goodgawd", "muthafucka", and "SMD" from my s*it, and clean up the fonetik s*it a little, and you'd never reckanize me.

The biggest giveaway that Phil Scott really is jb is, well, the only person in the world that can agree with, or simply stand jb is in fact jb. That alone can be used as an alias test, unless the poster is a hapless newbie.

Brother Lightfoot, then, would appear as another jb alias, except BL's natural incoherency is hard to duplicate (Vinny and Milgil come close, tho), and I think his favor towards an utter and complete frenzied asshole like jb comes from engineering flaws in the still BL keeps out back yonder, which fails to suff'ly fractionate off the methanol from the ethanol.

If BL fixes his still, and once BL fully detoxifies and recovers, he will likely revile jb's frenzied stupidness like most of the normal matchinists on amc, and cadcam'ers on ccs.

Anyway, unless Phil Scott has been drinking BL's methanol-laced moonshine, we must conclude that Phil Scott is in fact jb, based on the fact that jb does not make Phil palpably nauseous, and that they seem similarly confused.

That's strong evidence, but you really can nail him on mechanical issues alone. Aside from misusing "menu's" as a plural rather than as a possessive (a dozen or so times each, according to Google), they both misspell "dearth" in the same way (as "dirth" -- an ususual word in ordinary discourse, to begin with). There are a couple of other mechanical errors you can find, and there is a pattern of incomplete periodic sentences. They both lose it at about the same point.

As for you, you could take out the "natural incoherency" and still spot your running style (a technical literary term, not a style for marathoners or running dogs) at 20 paces. d8-)

-- Ed Huntress

(It looks like "Jon" is taking over from "Phil." At this point, JB's hair grows long and he starts baying at the moon. Phil may return tomorrow to repair the damage. He won't remember a thing that "Jon" did.)

What does this remind us of? How about every time JB is caught in a lie, or in playing some ego game, and he can't figure out what else to do except to try feverishly to distract attention?

Tell us, JB, why do you do these things? Do you have an abnormal need for praise, to the point where you have to create your own imaginary friends to do the praising for you, since no real person is likely to?

-- Ed Huntress

(Jon the short-tailed weasel sneaks a look from behind the potted plant...it's too far to run to the door...maybe he can snarl a little weasely snarl and intimidate something...maybe the plant will wilt...)

Is this your response to why you've created a sock puppet you've named "Phil" to sing your praises, because you really NEED it but no one else will give you more than the time of day?

You tug like a bluefish, Jon: Short jabs in random directions, wearing yourself out with distractions but never quite heading anywhere. The bluefish can never come to grips with the fact that he's hooked. Neither can you.

You're done. You'd might as well give up.

-- Ed Huntress

HELLO pot !

If Phil demonstrates an AQ (Assaholic Quotient) of 160 or above (4 standard deviations above the mean, or about .00001 percentile), that's compelling evidence that he's indeed jb.

An AQ > 160, and an IQ < 85 would pretty much be conclusive that he's jb.

Which one is the sock puppet, and which one of you is real, Jon? Is "Phil" real, and you're the puppet? Or is it the other way around?

We'll have to ask "Phil" -- if he ever comes back. Something tells me he's off for a few days of vacation. d8-)

-- Ed Huntress

Hahaha! Now I've seen it all! Jon berating somebody for reprinting press releases and ads. Now that's rich!

Maybe Siamese twins, joined at the scull, and the surgeons left half a brain for each when they did the separation?

KG

Hey, Banquer, you haven't answered the question. Is the Dave you mention here:

The same Dave that you called a "clique asshole," and whom you addressed as "spineless ***'s like James Meyette and Dave Thompson "?

Are we talking about the same guy here?

-- Ed Huntress

Please stop! I've now stepped on my dick so many times that it is paper thin. This is embarrassing because of the spray pattern I now create. Michelle now wants me to start cleaning our toilet (and the surrounding walls). My co-workers are all laughing at me (again). I really should just learn to keep my mouth shut, but you know that can never happen. I guess I just love making an ass of myself.

Jon Banquer San Diego, CA

There is little or no difference between his fake posts and most of the b.s. you post. You're not even a machinist, Wes. What you are is a lousy machine tool repairman who could never make the kinds of prototypes that I make yet you see fit to attack a skill you don't even have.

Is the truth sporting enough for you?

================================================

Here's some truth, Sport:

You apparently know how to use Photobucket (or someone uses it for you), yet instead of posting your work, as many many others have done here (and as I will be doing in short order, pyooter illiteracy'n'all), you proudly post a photo of...... of....... of...... a s***ty li'l tool chest.

Man, no foolin, THAT one bowled me over.....

'course, it dudn't matter, anyways....

If you DID post a pic of some work, dollars to tramp oil it wouldn't be yours, and the PROOF of that would be, you wouldn't be able to explain -- or even invent -- how it was made. Or even be able to intelligently discuss the part, on any level.

In the YEARS of your posted useless assaholic drivel, you have made *actual contributions* of near-zero, have responded intelligently to direct queries ZERO times.

NOW it's correck....

Hey, but feel free to prove me, and everyone else, wrong. Post pics of yer s*it, and discuss them. We're all eyes/ears. Hey, just ONE pic of ANYTHING you've done.

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

rescuesite.com/

You know that all my work is TOP SECRET and I couldn't possibly post pictures of any items, especially as I don't acutally make any thing (except noise) myself. After all, I am employed by the largest, greatest and most technically advanced firm here in San Diego. Our janitorial force (of which I'm a member) is the finest, second to none.

Jon Banquer Chula Vista, CA