Film - The World's Fastest Indian

Mar 15, 2006 35 Replies

I'm still intrigued by the video release of the latter I saw a few months back: "Now with alternative ending".

The message from David Reid contains these words:

I always felt sorry for the iceberg.

In message , Guy King writes

There was a lot of righteous indignation when the flim had a leftpondian crew collect the Enigma machine from U571. Probbly quite simla to the leftpondian indigestion when David Lean had a rightpondian pilot break the sound barrier for the first time.

aye, I can understand artistic licence and the need to make it entertaining, provided you end up with something artistic and entertaining, the fastest indian was autistic and abysmal, the bits they left out about burts life and character, eg most of it, would have made a bloody good film, as opposed to a vehicle for hopkins to buy yet another villa / island somewhere.

these guys would make a "life and times of i.k. brunel" and mention in passing in the 64th minute that he might have designed a paperclip or something, while concentrating on the entirely ficticious love interest between mrs brunel and the gardener...

just as there are no kiwi actors who could have played burt, samuel l jackson would be cast as brunel, karen black as mrs brunel, and a cgi river phoenix as the gardener, automobiles supplied by the ford motor company, coca cola is the real thing.

makes me puke.

if you want a laugh, check out the rowan atkinson film "keeping mum"

But would you recommend the film or not?

On or around 16 Mar 2006 12:30:06 -0800, snipped-for-privacy@my-deja.com enlightened us thusly:

'twere, "A Night to Remember" is an infinitely better film.

indeed.

Although from an account of someone who was there (chap I know's father), "A Bridge Too Far" is not all that far from the truth.

On or around Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:38:52 +0000, David Reid enlightened us thusly:

hmmm. p'raps the ship doesn't sink?

's prolly that they changed the bit with the old woman.

Now i think your taking this whole thing out of proportion it is after all only a movie. Nothing more, nothing less. It does what is supposed to in that it entertains. (I've heard nothing but posotive reviews of the film, apart of course from your own).

I got the new dvd for christmas and was disapointed by the alternative ending. All that is different is that the crew of the research vessel try to stop her throwing the necklace into the sea.

Overall i think it is a pretty decent dvd though and personally one of my favourite films.

Mike M

miley snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com

I heartily agree, having been brought up in living memory of the original Titanic. It was an insult to those involved (but not the incompetants involved in its deployment).

"Kim Siddorn" wrote

Given the general approbation from several group regulars and opprobrium from one, shall we say, "occasional poster" - that seems like a reasonable decision ;-)

Now there's a novelty. I wonder if anyone has ever said that about Bunty before ?

One thing I will say for Anthony Hopkins - he admits that he acts for the money - quite refreshing to hear someone honest about his motives in that business! I think I heard him saying this in the context of being asked about the crap movies he has appeared in.

Probably should have left this thread to quietly disapear....

Sean Connery has said much the same: if they pay me, I do it. I did hear that if it was a crappy script he held out for a bigger pay cheque. No wonder the man has so much dosh!

The message from Kate Dicey contains these words:

I don't suppose he'd have got away with "If it was a crappy script I just tried to look less like Sean Connery"

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required