TIG weld on a 3in slip-on flange

Oct 21, 2026 Last reply: 2 days ago 3 Replies
Jump to replies (3)

Running a bead all the way around a 3in slip-on flange looks like the toughest part of this job to me, since the joint circles a pipe made of cylindrical steel with no corners to reset at. The maker handles it with a steady dipping rhythm: the rod goes into the molten puddle with a weaving motion, and the finished bead comes out uniform, holding a consistent woven pattern around the whole joint.



The setup deserves a close look. The torch carries a ceramic cup and a tungsten electrode, running a number 8 cup, with the amperage set at 210amps. Filler is 1/8th rod. In my view that combination seems well matched to a joint of this size, though I would be curious how the same settings behave on thinner stock.



The TIG torch strikes an electric arc for the weld, and a side-by-side comparison of the weld is included. To my eye that comparison makes the evenness of the bead easy to judge. For recording, a green welding lens filter was used, and the view stays readable through the brightest moments of the arc.



One thing is left open: the specific metal alloy, the filler material and the torch model are not stated anywhere. Those particulars would matter a lot to anyone planning a similar joint. I hope they turn up eventually, because the rest of the recipe is laid out clearly enough to follow.



Project by Scott Raabe. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


The pairing of a number 8 cup with 210amps strikes me as a smart call for a flange this size. A larger cup should give broader gas coverage on a wide circular joint, though it can be awkward in tight spots. With 1/8th filler the bead builds quickly too, so the dipping timing has to be precise.

How does the maker keep the weave spacing even while travelling the full circumference of the flange? I am curious whether the dipping rhythm stays constant all the way around or changes on the awkward approach angles near the end of the pass.

A follow-up listing the pipe alloy and the filler material would make this joint much easier to reproduce, since neither is given here. Another idea worth trying on the next flange: run a smaller cup and put the resulting bead next to this woven pattern in another side-by-side comparison.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required