I have one question: when I make block and want to insert it in a
drawing with the same characteristics as the original one where the
block is made (measurement units millimeters, scale 1:50), AutoCAD
automatically scales it so it is much smaller than the original - it is
scaled with factor 0.0394...and a field in a dialog box where this
factor is shown isn't available for overwriting. It is so annoying that
each time when inserting the block, I have to scale it manually
(1/0.0394%) in order to get the real measures.
How can I solve this problem?
Use something other than AutoCAD or it's clones ; }
Acad only really recognizes generic "units" of distance and then dresses
them up to look like other, real world units. If you drew it "in inches",
and import it to a draw "in meters" it will be 39.37 times "bigger" in a
world that recognizes both these unit types for what they are relative to
each other. Acad still doesn't do that after more than 25 years, and
probably never will.
I am told that the newer versions have smaller dwg files.
I had been lead to believe that they had rewritten the database in some
fundamental way that made it more efficient.
now I am told that the only reason the dwg files are smaller is because
COMPRESSION is built into the files.
so, when you zip them you get nada compression, or thereabouts.
the only thing I could see from that, other than the processor running
to compress and decompress on the fly while editing, is that it would
encourage lazy drafting.
assuming that large files DISCOURAGED lazy drafting.
really? :D where, in your office? all professionals that I know use
Autodesk products...what's your alternative? progecad and similar crapy
applications? autocad is the most comfortable CAD program I've ever
Don't get around much do you? I use a 2D program called VisualCadd that
can draw circles around any ACad program (pun intended) when it comes to
ease of use and speed. Not to mention it will run on any Windows 32-bit
version and doesn't require huge system resources and a huge hard drive.
And the cost is less than $500.
Bob Morrison, PE, SE
R L Morrison Engineering Co
It all depends on what NG's you read. Some of the people in the Autodesk Inventor NG say it is being phased out in flavour of inventor. But as we know if AD do phased it out it will be in flavour of one on there more massively over priced products.
a previous post ivana wrote...<BR>> really? :D where, in your office? all
professionals that I know use<BR>> Autodesk products...what's your
alternative? progecad and similar crapy<BR>> applications? autocad is the
most comfortable CAD program I've ever<BR>> worked in.<BR>>
<BR><BR>Don't get around much do you? I use a 2D program called VisualCadd
that <BR>can draw circles around any ACad program (pun intended) when it comes
to <BR>ease of use and speed. Not to mention it will run on any Windows
32-bit <BR>version and doesn't require huge system resources and a huge hard
drive.<BR><BR>And the cost is less than $500.<BR><BR>-- <BR>Bob Morrison, PE,
SE<BR>R L Morrison Engineering Co<BR>Structural & Civil
Engineering<BR>Poulsbo WA<BR>bob at rlmorrisonengr dot
err, no, I'm sitting on my arse all day, eating junk food and letting
CNN (and Bob Morrison, of course) inform me about the outer world.
I'm a civil engineer and by nature of my job, I meet architects and talk
to them on daily basis...vast majority of them uses autocad, several of
them are autodesk viz users and only one is an arhicad user.
I tried to draw in intelli/proge/bricks CAD programs only to realize
they're all a far cry from a productive software like autocad. not to
mention lots of bugs, sudden disappearing of certain toolbar buttons
etc. comfort goes along with price.
you don't want to pay for autocad? that's fine, but you won't sell the
story to me that visualcadd is a better piece of software.
I used Visual for several years and it's great within its limits, and
even improves on ACAD in some areas, BUT it is seriously limited, and
has real problems with exchanging files since it isn't the standard that
is widely used. Also, try rotating a dimensioned drawing and discover
really big problems. The biggest problem is that nobody with money to
invest really wants to do much with updating and marketing it. It's been
orphaned at least twice that I know (both Corel and IMSI), and where do
you turn to get bug fixes?
Bob Morrison wrote:
cost is SUCH a fun word. it means different things to different people.
I am simultaneously on both sides of the fence on this one, but I have
DO I NEED IT?
just from what I have gleaned, the civil packages added in to autocad
were a slower improvement. they focused more on other disciplines. so, I
would expect a civil engineer to rank autocad lower than an architect. I
DRAW SOME OF EACH, from time to time. archicad sucked, bodaciously. I
began in DigiCad, some of you will now be laughing. laugh long and hard,
it still hurts. but I am still not an autocad disciple.
that, and I don't know of anybody who fully exploits their CAD package,
with the possible exclusion of Michael. So, you are really rating an
entire package based on some subset of features, aren't you?
I was doing a little research (spying on another firm) this morning, and
my source told me that he was on the most current version of autocad.
he said "7". I said "what about 8?" after checking, he found out he WAS
I would bet my left nut that although he has worked in autocad for the
past 15 years, and is NOT lazy nor merely a monkey in a seat, he does
not actually USE 70% of the software package they are paying out the
wazoo for. BUT THEY HAVE TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE REST OF THE WORLD.
this is an artificial cost - read "hype".
so hard to get a fair comparison when someone, anyone, has to invest so
much time using a product so as to be able to get specific as to WHY one
product is superior.
Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.