why generally deadbeat controller is not robust? any suggestions?
deatbeat controller
Mar 06, 2006
3 Replies
Techniques that require pole-zero cancellation are generally not robust.
fred
Unless you can eyeball the system and know what pole locations are safe
-- and that doesn't really count.
Because it generally requires absurdly high gains, and loop closing frequencies well above the points where the plant model is no longer reliable.
You may be able to make a very high-order deadbeat controller that's robust, by padding it's response enough to bring the loop closure frequencies down -- this would be an interesting research topic. Keeping it deadbeat in real life would undoubtedly require an adaptive controller.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required