deatbeat controller

why generally deadbeat controller is not robust? any suggestions?

Reply to
sunnewton
Loading thread data ...

Techniques that require pole-zero cancellation are generally not robust.

fred

Reply to
Fred Stevens

Unless you can eyeball the system and know what pole locations are safe

-- and that doesn't really count.

Reply to
Tim Wescott

Because it generally requires absurdly high gains, and loop closing frequencies well above the points where the plant model is no longer reliable.

You may be able to make a very high-order deadbeat controller that's robust, by padding it's response enough to bring the loop closure frequencies down -- this would be an interesting research topic. Keeping it deadbeat in real life would undoubtedly require an adaptive controller.

Reply to
Tim Wescott

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.