Shameless Plug

Embedded Systems Programming Magazine has sunk to a new low -- they made
article their cover story in the July issue.
Tee hee.
formatting link

Reply to
Tim Wescott
Loading thread data ...
Congratulations, and my condolences to ESP. :)
Scanning over the article, it looks good, I've been aware of the techniques you describe for a while, but it's always good to see another article on it and some more ideas on how to use it.
Reply to
Ben Bradley
Good show.
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
Reply to
Spehro Pefhany
Congratulations. It's a good article.
Reply to
Herman Family
Nicely done- I was anxious to see a analytical expression of some sort for the actual distribution of the noise energy as a function of the quantizer resolution and the integrator time constant so that this can be bounded from the start rather than through simulation. Your system reminded of exactly of an analog circuit for very high resolution analog voltage to duty cycle conversion using a single chip oa-vref-comparator combination where the oa integrates the error difference between the Vin and an output of the comparator switching between Vref and gnd.
Reply to
Fred Bloggs
Some software engineers can be remarkably averse to that sort of thing -- editors too.
It doesn't seem to make much difference for a 1st-order system, and analytical expressions for such a nonlinear system are hard to come by. I was going to include 2nd-order sigma-deltas in there, but I was not at all satisfied with my own understanding of them so I'm leaving those bits out until I know what the f*** I'm talking about.
It sounds like you were just using a 1st-order analog sigma-delta. The sigma-delta modulator itself is what is used in those itty bitty 24-bit ADC converters that you can get for instrumentation, they're just preceded by a 2nd- or 3rd-order loop filter, and succeeded by _lots_ of digital filtering before the answer gets chunked out to a microprocessor.
Reply to
Tim Wescott
Nice one, Tim. Today ESP., tomorrow, Time. ;->
Reply to
Paul Burridge
Hey Tim,
Neat! Congratulations.
Reply to
Rick Lyons
Hey, what about taking the extra LSBs and using them to index into a lookup table full of duty-cycle "waveform" bitmaps? Then you could approximate higher-order delta-sigmas without actually having to do a bunch of integrations.
Like 0001001000101010 = duty cycle pattern for 5/16 of a DAC lsb
1011010110110011 = 10/16
or something.
Reply to
John Larkin

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.