I have a control path with PT1 behavior. However all the formulas for controller tuning (Ziegler-Nichols, Chien-Hrones-Reswick) assume the approximation for a deadtime of the system. When setting Tu:=0 some constants become infinite with the existing rules.
Can anybody guide me to some tuning formulas that work for a PT1 path (given K and T)?
pb
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
T
Tim Wescott
PT1?
You left out Astrom-Hagglund tuning, which is a variant of Ziegler-Nichols that's supposed to give better damping.
P
Peter Bencsik
I mean a first-order-no-delay model.
In all reports and books I have found first-order-plus-delay models but no clues how to handle the case with zero delay.
pb
P
Peter Nachtwey
So what it Tu? That can't be right. Something is wrong.
That confused me too. I wish people would define their symbols and not assume we all use the same ones.
That is strange normally it is the other way around. You need better books.
Look at
formatting link
There are FOPDT gain calculation formulas there that will work when the dead time is 0.
BTW, it is easy to derive Kc and Ti in terms of Kp, Tp and Tc using direct synthesis or pole placement. If that isn't in your books then you do need new books.
Peter Nachtwey
Almost forgot Kp = plant gain Tp = plant time constant Tc = closed loop time constant Kc = controller gain Ti = integrator time constant
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.