Equipment Damaged
----------------- The equipment damaged is DC motor of Hitachi make. Item DC motor Make/Model Hitachi Limited, Japan Year of Mfg. 1993-1994 Size/Capacity KW: 2 x 1900 KW, RPM: 320 / 870 RPM, Voltage 2 x 600V DC Current (Armature): 3420A, Field Current: 146 / 39A, Field Voltage: 440/ 2V, Rating: continuous.
Background
---------- A 6-Hi Reversing Cold Rolling Mill has been installed in the year
1993-94. The Mill is used for the rolling of Hot Rolled coils to the desired smaller thickness coils. It has a capacity to roll 12,000 to
15,000 tons coils at a maximum speed of 1200 MPM. The main mill stand rolls are driven by a D.C. Motor of 2 x 1900 KW at 2 x 600 V DC. Speed and direction of this motor is controlled through Thyristor Convertors of HITACHI HISSEC-04M make.
The Incident
------------ On 14/09/2003 at 18:15 hrs, when the second coil after roll change was being rolled to 0.37 x 915 mm size, during sixth pass, when Mill was running at around 800 MPM and 2 T of material was rolled, the circuit breaker of main mill motor tripped. The operator of the main motor observed smoke and spark in the motor. He also observed that Entry Tension Reel and Delivery Tension Reel had stopped, but mill drive motor continued to rotate for 3 to 4 minutes. On visual inspection of the motor, it was found that the smoke was coming from the Non Drive End side armature riser. The flash marks/carbon soots were seen on both the sides of commutators at the edge of the segments. The flash mark was also seen on some of the brush holders on both sides as well as on the commutator cover of drive side. On meggaring, Non Drive End armature resistance was found having zero insulation, whereas Drive End armature resistance was found having 20 mega-ohms. After removing the top rocker arms and stator half, flash marks were also found on the armature. After de-brazing the risers and lifting flashed over windings, it was found that two bunch of equalizer windings and 7 nos. main armature coils were damaged by flash over. It was also observed that the spot of the flash-over was at a different spot and not at the same spot as the previous one which occurred in November 2002. On 25/09/2003, 7 coils of main winding and 2 coils of equalizer windings were replaced. In order to replace coils in equalizer winding, the steel bandage holding of the equalizer winding was partially cut. Since it was not possible to replace this bandage without lifting all the coils of main winding, it was decided by the repairers to leave it with proper insulation. The main winding was then tightened using resiglass bandage on the outer side. In the absence of high pot test facilities, only insulation drop test and meggar tests were conducted. On 26/09/2003 at 03:30 hrs, the mill was started at 04:00 hrs with lot of restriction on load & speed limited to 900 MPM. The rolling continued with strict observations for any abnormality. However, two trippings in the motor were observed on 28/09/2003. On 30/09/2003 at 13:20 hrs, when the speed of the motor was increased, the commutator side hang over bandage got peeled off from outer skin. Also one rise had got broken. The same was repaired using araldite (adhesive) and the rolling was resumed. After inspection, the motor was operated in normal condition to observe the further damage of bandage. On 02/10/2003 at 06:40 hrs, during the run, again a flash over occurred in the zone of repairs resulting into breakage of riser bandage. On meggaring, Non Drive End side motor showed earth fault in the armature, whereas insulation value of field was 1 mega-ohm. On dismantling it was noticed that the flashover had taken place below the equalizer winding newly placed during the repairs. Also many risers were found broken from the middle within the zone of repairs.
Questions
----------
- What would have been the cause of failure(s) at each occasion?
- Whether the method of partial repair followed in this situation is technically correct? Which other methods of partial repair prevail?
- Is the failure on 20/09/2003 independent of the failure on
14/09/2003? Reasons?
- Is the failure on 02/10/2003 result of bad workmanship of repairs carried out due to failure on 14/09/2003?