Yes it does. 2005 NEC 250.24(C)(1) This [grounding] conductor shall be
routed with the phase conductors...
Give me each of the run lengths and i will calculate it up for you. Also,
i will need to know how the conduit is mounted and against what material.
I also will want to know what conductor insulation you are considering, i
may ask you to change it.
Bonding the neutral at the service entrance is an NEC requirement.
Bonding the rest of the neutrals is a separate and somewhat twitchy
matter. I was party to a 3 hour meeting in the workplace trying to
determine correct policy on this a month or two back.
You likely will have to install a grounding electrode. If you just
follow NEC you certainly will.
Don't be afraid to use that phone number. They would much rather that
you get it right. It is definitely in their interest that you do.
Unless you are working with an ungrounded cable system
Exception No. 1: As provided in 250.130(C), the equipment grounding
conductor shall be permitted to be run separately from the circuit
250.130 Equipment Grounding Conductor Connections
(C) Nongrounding Receptacle Replacement or Branch Circuit Extensions.
The equipment grounding conductor of a grounding-type receptacle or a
branch-circuit extension shall be permitted to be connected to any of
(1) Any accessible point on the grounding electrode system as
described in 250.50
(2) Any accessible point on the grounding electrode conductor
(3) The equipment grounding terminal bar within the enclosure
where the branch circuit for the receptacle or branch circuit
(4) For grounded systems, the grounded service conductor within
the service equipment enclosure
(5) For ungrounded systems, the grounding terminal bar within the
service equipment enclosure
FPN: See 406.3(D) for the use of a ground-fault circuit-interrupting
type of receptacle.
If i am fully informed about what is existing and what is contemplated i
can give "official" advice. Use the local electric company and
inspectors as much as you can first, though.
The NEC has cut that back pretty sharply recently. A single neutral for
a single multipole breaker is allowed and very common. It may be allowed
in some other cases, provided none of the load current is presented to
the neutral conductor.
All neutrals are white, but not all whites are neutrals. You have to
have 2 (or 3) hots, from different phases, sharing the white in order
for it to be a neutral.
In two wire circuits, the white is usually (mistakenly) called a
neutral because it has a ground potential. It always carries the same
current as the hot.
A real neutral carries only the *difference* in amperage between the
The right term for a white in a two wire circuit is 'an identified,
Note I said 'grounDED' conductor, not 'grounDING'. There's a difference.
** could be called sum. It depends how you mark the vectors in the
diagram. (+120 v at 0 degrees) plus (+120 v at 120 degrees) plus (+120
at 240 degrees) equals zero.
Well, in a single phase service, the two sides of the phase seem to be
180 out if you use the common tap as reference (black lead) and MOVE
the lead (red lead) you are measuring with.
In polar notation that would be (120 V at 0 degrees) plus (120 at 180
degrees) equals zero volts. The rectangular equivalent is:
(+120 +j0) + (-120 + j0) = 0 (swapped meter leads)
In reality, it's the same current flowing through the entire secondary
winding. There is NO phase angle difference between the two sides. No
amount of centre taps will add a phase.
Think of two car batteries in series. Measuring from between the two
batteries to the free terminals on either side will give you the same
numbers. (+12v) +(-12v) = 0v. Measure between the two outermost
terminals and you get 24 volts. (12v +12v) = 24v. The currents are
sure not out by 180 degrees in the batteries.
In a single phase, centre tapped transformer it's identical.
One reason they ground that centre point in your panel is that it
limits the maximum available fault voltage to ground to 1/2 of line to
line voltage. That is the absolute maximum fault voltage to ground you
can get. Start moving that ground around and fault voltage rises.
The other reason the ground is in the middle is that it clamps the
voltage of the phase sides to 120. If it weren't there, the two sides
of the transformer secondary would act like a series circuit, with
each side having a different voltage, depending on what was plugged
into each. The two voltages would still add up to 240, but one side
may be 80 volts and the other 160.
That situation is called a 'floating neutral'.
These guys explain it a lot better:
Last I heard, a multipole breaker was only required if the hots went
to the same device. Where two or three hots, on alternate phases, feed
their own individual loads, a single neutral wire was allowed for that
group of breakers.
If this has been changed, when did it happen? I haven't opened a Code
book in a couple of years.
Look at office receptacle circuits. You can have three receptacles in
a row, on phases a, b and c. A single white goes back to the panel. If
only one receptacle is being used, the white is certainly 'presented'
with the load current.
If TWO of the receptacles are being used, the neutral is STILL
carrying load current. Only when all three hots are carrying an equal
current is the neutral current free.
Multiwire circuits are now required to have a common trip (multi-pole)
breaker feeding all circuits that share a neutral. In your example of 3 (20
amp) outlet circuits in an office, yes you can run 3 hots and one neutral
back. But now, instead of 3 1-pole 20 amp breakers you are required to
install one 3-pole 20 amp breaker. The reasoning behind this is if you turn
off one of the 1-pole 20 amp breakers to work on the circuit. Yes that one
hot wire is dead, but if you were to break the neutral splice, the other two
circuits sharing the neutral can backfeed the white wire and kill you.
BTW, your load carrying neutral example is incorrect. The neutral carries
current anytime there exists an imbalanced load between any two hot wires
sharing a neutral. If you have two hots and one neutral with one hot
carrying 10 amp and the other carrying 13 amp, then the neutral carries the
difference of 3 amps. Assuming the 2 hots are correctly install to not be on
the same phases. If they were on the same phases, then the neutral carries
the combined load of 10 and 13 amps, or 23 amps. It's basically the same
with a 3-phase setup except you throw the third hot into the mix and the
unbalance load calculations are a bit more complex. If all hot carried the
same current load, then the neutral is carrying nothing.
Yes, the difference between the loads. But only in a single phase,
three wire circuit. Much like the old Edison three wire circuit.
I agree. The have to be on alternate sides of the single phase, or on
separate phases in a 3 phase system.
Three phase is a bit weirder. *Two* distinct hot phase wires with a
shared neutral will see the neutral carry the SAME line current even
when the two phases are evenly loaded.
That's why in, say, a residential apartment building, with 208/120
feeds to the units (two hots and a neutral), you can not derate the
In 3 phase, You have to have all three hots feeding a load equally
before the neutral balances out.
I'm guessing that if all the waves were the same shape, it wouldn't
make a difference.
Start putting a different shaped wave or one of a different period on
each phase and then it's a different ballgame.
Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.