Interesting old newsreel - but its replacement ALSO gallops when the
wind blows a certain way. This is a difficult site, no doubt.
Brian Whatcott Altus OK
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:02:12 -0700, "Matthew Beasley" wrote this to
Robert Clark:
Without doing even trivial background research, I am tempted to say
that the built up trusses give this the look of a bridge rather older
than 40 years old, to my eye at least.
Brian W
I almost let this suggestion go in and out.
But setting out a few survey camera tripod points round a structure
for a yearly shot, would be just so cost-effective, it sounds like a
winner.
Setup cost could hardly be more than $1,000 per bridge,
and maybe $200 p.a per bridge.
What's for a politician not to love about this one?
Shoulda patented the method, Dave!
Brian W
Dear Brian Whatcott:
If you get rich and famous, and accidentally find yourself in
Arridzona, buy me a coffee (if it is not over $2 per cup). I
seem to recall mention of doing this with a single time-of-flight
instrument, from a single location. Multiple locations will only
improve / reduce the granularity.
It will only work if there is significant secular changes in the
shape of the structure. I am not convinced there were, and I
know we disagree here.
But the fact that corrosion can be so easily overlooked, or
visual inspection in many places too difficult to perform...
*that* is where headway needs to be made. Short of hiring
"Superman"...
David A. Smith
It is a very similar design to the I-35W bridge, down to the rather
"pointed" joints connecting to the concrete supports.
This is a two lane bridge with only 1/5th the traffic as the I-35W
which probably helped it to survive 70 years:
Deception Pass Bridge.
formatting link
I would still like to see how those joints look close-up. Do they have
the same amount of corrosion at the joints and on the steel beams
around the joints as was apparent on the I-35W bridge before the
collapse:
Looking more closely at that image you gave of the Deception Pass
Bridge I would say the joints are actually more like the wider ones on
the Desoto Bridge rather than the almost point-like ones on the I-35W.
Zoom in on the joints in these images:
Deception Pass Bridge
formatting link
I-35W bridge.
formatting link
Desoto bridge.
formatting link
Remember pressure increases inversely as the *square* of the area. So
a joint only 1/2 as wide would experience 4 times as much pressure on
it.
Bob Clark
eight lane bridge,
possibly originally four. Now scale thebearing and concrete pillars up by a
factor of two-to-four on theDeception Pass bridge, and compare them to I-35W
again.http://dc.metblogs.com/archives/2007/08/minneapolis_i35.phtmlhttp://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?s=e81e03332c5cc1040893c91497e63229&showtopic=38175&st=0&p=767639&http://www.thisweek-online.com/2000/january/7burns.html...the original design appears to have been a 4 lane, with thedeck widened (to 6
then adding "HOV")later.http://www.johnweeks.com/bridges/pages/ms16.html... the
bridge was being operated with failed bearings, placingthe structure in a bind.
Additionally, it looks like all thetraffic was placed on one half the bridge,
due to lanestriping... creating an off center load.Robert, I understand your
position, but this appears to me tohave been negligence, not "poor design". Add
to this the varioussolutions they tried for the persistent "black ice"
problem...David A. Smith
That had been repaired. The hidden meaning in that is that someone in
the state bridge maintenance program KNEW that the bridge had an
ongoing problem with fatigue cracks and was satisifed that the
patchwork repairs were adequate.
I don't think the joints themselves are pointed, The little pyramids
are roofs to keep water and snow off the actual joint hardware, which,
if it is built with the standards of the time, should be pinned pivots
at one end and rollers at the other.
Ah.
Sadly, wrong. The Big Dig in Mass. is now spending monies
on law suits. I'm beginning to think that this is part of
a plan, but I used be paid to be paranoid.
Here there was not a murder indictment. (A lady was killed
when the top piece of a tunnel just built smushed her.)
Now the news is reporting that the cement used in the tunnels
was watered down. WTF was the state chemists?
/BAH
This is something I know I know nothing about. Do they have
to put pieces back together (like in airplanes) to do analyses?
Was it 8 (or whatever) lanes wide when it was built?
/BAH
Correction. That should be pressure increases inversely with the
area, which is as the square of the diameter. A support half as wide
would undergo 4 times the pressure.
Bob Clark
:
: Interesting old newsreel - but its replacement ALSO gallops when the
: wind blows a certain way. This is a difficult site, no doubt.
:
: Brian Whatcott Altus OK
Short Brothers built flying boats and on one new design the wings
tore off at the wing root. The aeronautical engineers did the obvious
thing and strengthened the wing roots. Again on take-off the wings
tore off at the root. This time the engineers added braces between
the wings but even that didn't work, so they added struts. Once
again the wings tore off at the roots, and everyone was scratching
the heads except the janitor. Overnight he borrowed a drill and
without telling anyone drilled a line of holes along the wing roots.
The next day the new plane took off and flew perfectly, and
when it landed the engineers took it apart to see what was so different,
and of course they found the line of drilled holes. An inquiry was
held to find out how they got there and the janitor owned up, so they
asked him how a lavatory cleaner would know the plane would fly.
He said "In my experience nothing ever tears along the dotted line".
lane
bridge, possibly originally four. Now scale thebearing and concrete pillars up
by a factor of two-to-four on theDeception Pass bridge, and compare them to
I-35W
again.http://dc.metblogs.com/archives/2007/08/minneapolis_i35.phtmlhttp://w......the original design appears to have been a 4 lane, with thedeck widened (to 6
then adding "HOV")later.http://www.johnweeks.com/bridges/pages/ms16.html... the
bridge was being operated with failed bearings, placingthe structure in a bind.
Additionally, it looks like all thetraffic was placed on one half the bridge,
due to lanestriping... creating an off center load.Robert, I understand your
position, but this appears to me tohave been negligence, not "poor design". Add
to this the varioussolutions they tried for the persistent "black ice"
problem...David A. Smith
Thanks for those links. On my reader the links got garbled. Here they
are again:
Burnsville looks back at a rich history
by John Gessner
Staff Writer
Posted 1/7/00
formatting link
Minneapolis I-35W Bridge Collapse
posted by Brownpau at 11:06 PM on August 01, 2007
formatting link
Freeway history in your city.
formatting link
These all say the I-35W bridge was originally a 4 lane that was
widened to an 8 lane, with the steel superstructure staying largely
the same, and the concrete supports and joints unchanged.
The design may have been adequate for a 4 lane with sixties traffic,
but not for an 8 lane with 90's and 2000's traffic. However, I still
don't like those point-like joints.
Bob Clark
Dear jmfbahciv:
I don't think they *have* to, but I think they *want* to look at
every failed piece.
It looks like, from what I can find, it was 4 lanes wide at
design (all lanes within substructure-width), was widened to 6
lanes later, and probably restriped to get the 8 lanes it had at
time-of-failure.
David A. Smith
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.