Daniel,
Like all open-ended engineering problems, the answer to this question is: "That depends".
I ran into a similar situation many years ago during a thermo-dynamics examination, set by a professor with degrees from Harvard and Princeton. (Impressive but he couldn't teach worth a damn).
The entire exam revolved around the design of gas turbines and my initial thought was that the time available was way too short: 3 hr exam. Closer review of the questions showed serious shortcoming of data.
I answered the entire exam with qualitative "here is how I would do it" answers, describing my logic and thought process, but never supplying one calculation.
The professor was pissed at me but gave me a decent mark when I pointed out what would happen on an official appeal, what with the "errors of omission" on his paper.
Methinks I rambled somewhat?
Short answer: Describe the circumstanced under which each option would prevail, ie. dominate. Even if the exam is of the true/false or multiple choice type, write your answer on the side or back of the sheet. You can then argue and substantiate your position on appeal. Note that even text books get some of the answers wrong.
Wolfgang