- posted
11 years ago
Male Professionals with Higher Ethical Standards Earn Less
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
That jumped out at me as well. It'd be interesting to know how the study controlled for the obvious problem. Reminds me of the old riddle about the liar and the truth-teller.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Reports in the press of studies like that never seem to mention such self- selection.
And they certainly never seem to take into account the people who just don't answer the survey at all -- they just blithely assume that all the folks who look at the survey, say "pfffft!!" and toss it in the round file are exactly like all the folks with interest and time enough to actually answer the thing.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Most studies you read nowadays are the product of desperate PhDs tryna keep dey useless jobs -- the proverbial publish or perish. It was ALWAYS publish or perish, except previously "quality" -- heh, and honesty -- was implicit. Now, it's any goddammthing, incl, I think, confabulation.
Science stopped being science shortly after Watson&Crick -- partic Watson -- stole Linus Pauling's THIRD nobel prize. And Roslyn Franck's, and a bunch of others.
Pauling was LITERALLY minutes away from solving the structure. He had ALREADY solved the triple helix of alpha keratin, and had deduced the double helix structure of DNA, except with an inverted backbone. A cupla more minutes with the data Watson had hijacked, and bang......
And there's always the Bogdanoff Bros.:
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Geez, and we needed to pay somebody several hundred K $ to figure this out??????
Umm, you leave out lawyers, politicians "investment consultants" and you already have skewed the curve.
Jon
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
YUP!!!!!! More, if you factor in university pensions.
Don't forget the 10,000 or so scientists who can't agree on how to read an effing thermometer.... They should hire my wife... She can accurately read a thermometer -- of all types -- clear up to 450 F!!!
And, of course, don't forget Cold Fusion.....
Here, "ethical" without the preceding "Un-" would indeed be a confabulation.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Not confused at all...just sayin that oftentimes, envy underlies = contempt.