Cliff wrote:
>
>> In article , pyotr
filipivich
> writes:
>>
>>
>>> Sure Michael, and the Bushes went to war against the expressed desires
>>>of the Saudi royal family because Bushes are so controlled by the Saudis.
>>
>>
>> Are these not suposedly (per the propaganda) the exact same folks
>> the shrub claimed he was protecting *from* Saddam by doing so?
>> The same ones that have (IIRC) evicted the US military from
>> Saudi Arabia?
>>
>> Need clues?
>
>Here are some clues for you...
>
>FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attached us: Japan did.
> From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year. >
>Truman finished that war and started on in Korea, North Korea never
>attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of >18,333 per year.
>
>John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never >attacked us.
>
>Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives
>were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
>
>Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent; Bosnia never
>attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter
three
times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple >occasions.
>
>In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has
>liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put
>nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot,
>and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. >
>We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for less
>time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.
>
>There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq during the month of
>January.....in the fair city of Detroit (Michigan) there were 35
murders
in the month of January. That's one American City folks, about as
>deadly as the entire war-torn country of Iraq!!!
>
>Michael