I never really had the chance to work much with rifles, just no easy
access to a range. But, it has always been on my wish list.
I did find that in 41 and 44 with reduced loads, WAY down on the scale,
the use of magnum primers is necessary to get reliable ignition. I've
had 44's squib on me because of powder position---the charge didn't
ignite but the primer pushed the bullet half way into the barrel jamming
the cylinder. I don't futz with mouse loads in big cases anymore.
Indeed. Anything under about 800 fps is a mouse load. As I recall..you
were loading the 45 at about 600 or so. Those become critcal in making
sure the burn actually occurs.
The 41 can be loaded as hot or hotter than the 44...but neither
really arnt a hell of a lot of fun to shoot, are too powerful for self
defense and are only good for big game or metallic sillouette.
Shrug. Keep the numbers in mid range and you wont have any issues.
Gunner
The methodology of the left has always been:
1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie
I start low and slowly work up. Groups get tighter. I slowly work up
until groups start to enlarge. That's my load for that bullet, powder,
primer and length. Change anything and repeat. Sometimes there is a
big window until the group starts to enlarge.
That works great with a rifle. Not so much with a handgun.
Shrug
Gunner
The methodology of the left has always been:
1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie
YOU are the one "exactly like Gunner". Anytime you don't like a
thread, you make some baseless personal charges that you can know
nothing about and then morph the subject with each post.
That's Gunner; that's you. Birds of a feather; mindless zealots for
extreme political positions and brother trolls.
My "horseshit" was to say most of the world is struggling financially.
If you want to dispute that - it's up to YOU to prove that what
everyone sees in their daily experience isn't the case. Come on,
little troll. Tell us about how much the economy has improved under
Obama. Not two guys in Peoria got a job flipping burgers, give us some
indisputable big stuff.
The facts are:
1. You started with "Well, this IS the Obama economy after all.
Everyone is having trouble." That is patently untrue, as I for one am
NOT having trouble. Quite the opposite, and I'm hardly alone.
2. Rather than own up to your first exaggeration, you doubled down and
added that "Obama promised to make it all better in his first couple
months in office."
No, they're your claims, therefore it's your job to prove them. You
can't, and you'll never even try beyond writing more horseshit.
OK, apparently you're back to claiming that "everyone", which includes
you and I, is having financial troubles. I KNOW you can't prove any
troubles for me, but feel free to post evidence of YOUR troubles. But
don't forget that you already pretended not to have any. In response
to my telling you that I was financially secure, you wrote: "Have you
ever pondered the possibility that you ain't the only one? And it
ain't just you and me, Bunky."
formatting link
Now make up your tiny mind. Are you one of the "not just and me" you
say are NOT having financial troubles, or are you one of the
"everyone" you claim ARE having financial troubles?
Yeah, he fixed it like you fix your tom cat. Wait for the great unwashed to
notice that the termination of the 2% FICA reduction is indeed a tax on the
middle class.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.