Steam Whistle 2

Hope all who asked for the whiste plans have got them OK, certainly had enough requests ! Just to clarify how this thing works ( I think ! ), Air/steam blows through an anular orifice in line with the base of a thin wall bell or chime, making it ring or hoot. The tone obviously depends on the dimensions of the chime- larger will lower the tone. There are two adjustments in my one- the base parts screw in and out to adjust the air orifice, but if you have the outer and inner parts level with each other that should be about right. The chime screws up and down in relation to the orifice, not to sure of the physics of it, but this needs to be fiddled with to get the loudest volume-guess this has to do with the resonance. I believe there are some of these whistles with a loose plate or little propellor type thing inside the chime that moves up and down as the air is supplied giving an osscilating tone, that would be a novelty ! but not had time to play with that, wife complained enough about the noise last time ! Like to hear if anyone tries this with steam, does it sound different than with air? All the drawings I,ve sent off to you all are autocad LT ones, if anybody wants another format let me know. All dimensions are metric (mm) by the way. Cheers, Mark

Reply to
Markgengine
Loading thread data ...

How about dropping them in the dropbox?

Reply to
Bill Bright

Er.. what's the dropbox ?

Reply to
Markgengine

Also, before any body starts to moan, I know that there are some missing dimensions and obvious mistakes on the drawings, I was originally more interested in making the thing & drawings were originally ony for my record, also with my lathe I'm lucky to get better than +/_ 0.5 mm anyhow !

Reply to
Markgengine

On 27 Apr 2004 12:46:08 GMT, snipped-for-privacy@aol.com (Markgengine) brought forth from the murky depths:

I asked that same question and sent the URL. Here it is again with instructions on how to use it:

formatting link

========================================================== CAUTION: Do not use remaining fingers as pushsticks! ==========================================================

formatting link
Comprehensive Website Development

Reply to
Larry Jaques

[snip]

Actually what happens is that the air/steam blowing against the knife edge of the bell causes the air to flow into the bell which becomes pressurized. The stream of air is then forced outside the bell (lower pressure). This results in a drop in pressure inside the bell and the air then fills the bell again and the process starts over. The air flipping back and forth makes the sound. This all happens very quickly, of couse.

Think of a reed in a saxophone, the air is the reed in the case of a whisle.

Could you send me a set of plans in .pdf or .jpg?

steven at nas.com

Thanks,

Steven Harris Everson, WA

Reply to
Steven
[ ... ]

.pdf is good. .gif is good (for B&W line drawings. .tif is good. .jpg loses fine detail where lines intersect, thanks to its "lossy compression" scheme, which assures that you never get back exactly what you started with. The compression used in .gif and the (optional) compression in .tif are both lossless compression -- not quite as efficient, but you still get back every bit of detail which you put in to start with.

I second (or third) the request for the dropbox (my e-mail blocks anything over 30K to keep virii out), and some format which does not depend on Windows (as I use unix variants).

Thanks, DoN.

Reply to
DoN. Nichols

I've been using .png for anything up to 256 colours. It's lossless and generally smaller than .gif. It really shrinks 'em up for 16 or 2 colours and I have yet to find a system that can't decode them. There was an interesting link to a study comparing .png to other formats in the digital photography NG some time ago. If anyone really cares I'll see if I can find the link. .jpg is good for deep colour photos and not much else.

Yes. I'd like to see it too.

Ted

Reply to
Ted Edwards

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.