I've shot models against real equipment that didn't match plenty of times, and honestly both approaches work, it just depends on what you want the photo to say. If you blur hard enough, say shooting wide open at f/1.8 to f/2.8 and putting a good ten feet or more between you and the background train, the real one turns into colored streaks and the model reads as the only subject. The trick there is getting low so you're shooting the model at track level, which flattens the perspective and makes the background smear read as generic platform rather than specific country. A longer lens helps too, something in the 85 to 135mm range, beacuse compression makes the background train feel closer and less identifiable. What kills these shots is midday sun and a busy platform. Overcast or late afternoon, empty-ish platform, tight crop, and nobody can tell a TGV from a Vifty at that point. But I'll be honest, the lean-into-it version is usally the stronger photo. There's a long tradition of deadpan mismatch shots in this hobby. I once photographed a GG1 model sitting at Altona station in Hamburg next to a line of ICE sets and it looks absurd in the best way, like a postcard from a timeline that never happened. The mismatch only works if you commit though. Get the model dead level, nail the focus, keep the real train sharp enough to recognize, and let the viewer do the double take. Half-blurred half-committed is where things look off, which sounds like where you landed.
One more angle for you: there's actual history connecting the two worlds. Amtrak leased an ICE trainset for testing back in the early 90s and ran it on the Northeast Corridor, and the Genesis cabs were reportedly styled with those ICE lines in mind. So if anyone gives you grief about a US diesel on a European platform, you've got a legitimate excuse baked in. I'd try both versions this weekend, same spot, one wide open and tight, one everything sharp, then let them sit for a day before picking.